Characterization and reversal of synaptic defects in the amygdala in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN: 0027-8424, Vol: 107, Issue: 25, Page: 11591-11596
2010
- 124Citations
- 183Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations124
- Citation Indexes123
- 123
- CrossRef105
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures183
- Readers183
- 183
Article Description
Fragile X syndrome (FXS), a common inherited form of mental impairment and autism, is caused by transcriptional silencing of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Earlier studies have identified a role for aberrant synaptic plasticity mediated by the metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in FXS. However, many of these observations are derived primarily from studies in the hippocampus. The strong emotional symptoms of FXS, on the other hand, are likely to involve the amygdala. Unfortunately, little is known about how exactly FXS affects synaptic function in the amygdala. Here, using whole-cell recordings in brain slices from adult Fmr1 knockout mice, we find mGluR-dependent long-term potentiation to be impaired at thalamic inputs to principal neurons in the lateral amygdala. Consistent with this long-term potentiation deficit, surface expression of the AMPA receptor subunit, GluR1, is reduced in the lateral amygdala of knockout mice. In addition to these postsynaptic deficits, lower presynaptic release was manifested by a decrease in the frequency of spontaneous miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs), increased paired-pulse ratio, and slower use-dependent block of NMDA receptor currents. Strikingly, pharmacological inactivation of mGluR5 with 2-methyl-6-phenylethynyl-pyridine (MPEP) fails to rescue either the deficit in long-term potentiation or surface GluR1. However, the same acute MPEP treatment reverses the decrease in mEPSC frequency, a finding of potential therapeutic relevance. Therefore, our results suggest that synaptic defects in the amygdala of knockout mice are still amenable to pharmacological interventions against mGluR5, albeit in a manner not envisioned in the original hippocampal framework.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954858360&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002262107; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20534533; https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1002262107; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/3614964#eval4550111; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.3614964.4550111; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/3614964#eval3331065; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.3614964.3331065; https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002262107; https://www.pnas.org/content/107/25/11591; http://f1000.com/3614964#eval3331065; http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1002262107; http://www.pnas.org/content/107/25/11591; http://www.pnas.org/content/107/25/11591.abstract; http://www.pnas.org/content/107/25/11591.full.pdf; https://www.pnas.org/content/107/25/11591.abstract; https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/107/25/11591.full.pdf; http://f1000.com/3614964#eval4550111; http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1002262107
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know