Pre-Miocene birth of the Yangtze River
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN: 0027-8424, Vol: 110, Issue: 19, Page: 7556-7561
2013
- 312Citations
- 65Usage
- 147Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations312
- Citation Indexes312
- 312
- CrossRef230
- Usage65
- Downloads63
- Abstract Views2
- Captures147
- Readers147
- 147
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
The development of fluvial systems in East Asia is closely linked to the evolving topography following India-Eurasia collision. Despite this, the age of the Yangtze River system has been strongly debated, with estimates ranging from 40 to 45 Ma, to a more recent initiation around 2 Ma. Here, we present Ar/Ar ages frombasalts interbedded with fluvial sediments from the lower reaches of the Yangtze together with detrital zircon U-Pb ages from sand grains within these sediments. We show that a river containing sediments indistinguishable from the modern river was established before ~23 Ma. We argue that the connection through the Three Gorges must postdate 36.5 Ma because of evaporite and lacustrine sedimentation in the Jianghan Basin before that time. We propose that the present Yangtze River system formed in response to regional extension throughout eastern China, synchronous with the start of strike-slip tectonismand surface uplift in eastern Tibet and fed by strengthened rains caused by the newly intensified summer monsoon.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877356263&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216241110; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23610418; https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1216241110; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/409; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1408&context=geo_pubs; https://repository.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/409; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1408&context=geo_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216241110; https://www.pnas.org/content/110/19/7556; https://www.pnas.org/content/110/19/7556.abstract; https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/110/19/7556.full.pdf; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/19/7556; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/19/7556.abstract; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/19/7556.full.pdf; http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1216241110
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know