Eating up the world's food web and the human trophic level
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN: 0027-8424, Vol: 110, Issue: 51, Page: 20617-20620
2013
- 113Citations
- 435Captures
- 24Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations113
- Citation Indexes98
- 98
- CrossRef83
- Policy Citations15
- Policy Citation15
- Captures435
- Readers435
- 435
- Mentions24
- References9
- Wikipedia9
- Blog Mentions8
- Blog8
- News Mentions7
- News7
Most Recent Blog
Who Is at the Top of the Food Chain?
Though we might think we are, humans aren’t even that close to the top of the food chain.
Most Recent News
Service Providers in the Trophic Theory of Money
For now, the bottom line is that the TTOM will continue to serve as a durable reminder of the primacy of agricultural and extractive activity in economic production. It belies the notion of decoupling GDP from energy and material use.
Article Description
Trophic levels are critical for synthesizing species' diets, depicting energy pathways, understanding food web dynamics and ecosystem functioning, and monitoring ecosystem health. Specifically, trophic levels describe the position of species in a food web, from primary producers to apex predators (range, 1-5). Small differences in trophic level can reflect large differences in diet. Although trophic levels are among the most basic information collected for animals in ecosystems, a human trophic level (HTL) has never been defined. Here, we find a global HTL of 2.21, i.e., the trophic level of anchoveta. This value has increased with time, consistent with the global trend toward diets higher in meat. National HTLs ranging between 2.04 and 2.57 reflect a broad diversity of diet, although cluster analysis of countries with similar dietary trends reveals only five major groups. We find significant links between socio-economic and environmental indicators and global dietary trends. We demonstrate that the HTL is a synthetic index to monitor human diets and provides a baseline to compare diets between countries.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84890829207&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305827110; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24297882; https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1305827110; https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305827110; https://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617.abstract; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617.full.pdf; https://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617.abstract; https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/110/51/20617.full.pdf; http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/27/1305827110; http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/27/1305827110.abstract; http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/27/1305827110.full.pdf; http://m.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617?utm_content=buffer8c172&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer; http://buff.ly/1jqy3Ll; http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1305827110; http://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617.full
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know