Low-density Lipoprotein Receptor Represents an Apolipoprotein E-independent Pathway of Aβ Uptake and Degradation by Astrocytes *
Journal of Biological Chemistry, ISSN: 0021-9258, Vol: 287, Issue: 17, Page: 13959-13971
2012
- 162Citations
- 219Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations162
- Citation Indexes162
- 162
- CrossRef113
- Captures219
- Readers219
- 219
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Aβ Clearance—The Untapped Potential of Astrocytes?
A combination of retinoic acid and the cholesterol drug gemfibrozil prompted astrocytes to ingest and degrade Aβ. Mice treated this way had fewer amyloid plaques and performed better on cognitive tests.
Article Description
Accumulation of the amyloid β (Aβ) peptide within the brain is hypothesized to be one of the main causes underlying the pathogenic events that occur in Alzheimer disease (AD). Consequently, identifying pathways by which Aβ is cleared from the brain is crucial for better understanding of the disease pathogenesis and developing novel therapeutics. Cellular uptake and degradation by glial cells is one means by which Aβ may be cleared from the brain. In the current study, we demonstrate that modulating levels of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), a cell surface receptor that regulates the amount of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in the brain, altered both the uptake and degradation of Aβ by astrocytes. Deletion of LDLR caused a decrease in Aβ uptake, whereas increasing LDLR levels significantly enhanced both the uptake and clearance of Aβ. Increasing LDLR levels also enhanced the cellular degradation of Aβ and facilitated the vesicular transport of Aβ to lysosomes. Despite the fact that LDLR regulated the uptake of apoE by astrocytes, we found that the effect of LDLR on Aβ uptake and clearance occurred in the absence of apoE. Finally, we provide evidence that Aβ can directly bind to LDLR, suggesting that an interaction between LDLR and Aβ could be responsible for LDLR-mediated Aβ uptake. Therefore, these results identify LDLR as a receptor that mediates Aβ uptake and clearance by astrocytes, and provide evidence that increasing glial LDLR levels may promote Aβ degradation within the brain.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925820529682; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111.288746; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859980871&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383525; http://www.jbc.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/jbc.M111.288746; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/jbc.M111.288746; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021925820529682; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111.288746; http://www.jbc.org/content/287/17/13959; http://www.jbc.org/article/S0021925820529682/abstract; http://www.jbc.org/article/S0021925820529682/fulltext; http://www.jbc.org/article/S0021925820529682/pdf; https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)52968-2/abstract; http://www.jbc.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/jbc.M111.288746; http://www.jbc.org/content/287/17/13959.abstract; http://www.jbc.org/content/287/17/13959.full; http://www.jbc.org/content/287/17/13959.full.pdf; https://www.jbc.org/content/287/17/13959; http://f1000.com/715347822#eval790252950; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/715347822#eval790252950
American Society for Biochemistry & Molecular Biology (ASBMB)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know