A stable but reversible integrated surrogate reporter for assaying CRISPR/Cas9-stimulated homology-directed repair
Journal of Biological Chemistry, ISSN: 0021-9258, Vol: 292, Issue: 15, Page: 6148-6162
2017
- 14Citations
- 114Usage
- 93Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Patent Family Citations2
- Patent Families2
- Usage114
- Downloads88
- Abstract Views26
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Article Description
The discovery and application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for genome editing has greatly accelerated targeted mutagenesis in a variety of organisms. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated site-specific cleavage is typically exploited for the generation of insertions or deletions (indels) after aberrant dsDNA repair via the endogenous non-homology end-joining (NHEJ) pathway or, alternatively, for enhancing homology-directed repair to facilitate the generation of a specific mutation (or “knock-in”). However, there is a need for efficient cellular assays that can measure Cas9/guide RNA activity. Reliable methods for enriching and identifying desired mutants are also lacking. Here we describe a method using the Piggybac transposon for stable genomic integration of an H2B-GFP reporter or a hygromycin resistance gene for assaying Cas9 target cleavage and homology-directed repair. The H2B-GFP fusion protein provides increased stability and an obvious pattern of nuclear localization. This method, called SRIRACCHA ( i.e. a s table, but r eversible, i ntegrated r eporter for a ssaying C RISPR/ C as-stimulated H DR a ctivity), enables the enrichment of mutants via selection of GFP-positive or hygromycin-resistant mammalian cells (immortalized or non-immortalized) as a surrogate for the modification of the endogenous target site. Currently available hyperactive Piggybac transposase mutants allow both delivery and removal of the surrogate reporters, with minimal risk of generating undesirable mutations. This assay permits rapid screening for efficient guide RNAs and the accelerated identification of mutant clones and is applicable to many cell types. We foresee the utility of this approach in contexts in which the maintenance of genomic integrity is essential, for example, when engineering cells for therapeutic purposes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192582044952X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m117.777722; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017686507&origin=inward; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85018506310&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28228480; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002192582044952X; http://www.jbc.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/jbc.M117.777722; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/jbc.M117.777722; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/5861; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6868&context=open_access_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m117.777722; https://www.jbc.org/content/292/15/6148; http://www.jbc.org/article/S002192582044952X/abstract; http://www.jbc.org/article/S002192582044952X/fulltext; http://www.jbc.org/article/S002192582044952X/pdf; https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)44952-X/abstract; http://www.jbc.org/content/292/15/6148
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know