The Identification of Novel Potential Injury Mechanisms and Candidate Biomarkers in Renal Allograft Rejection by Quantitative Proteomics *
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, ISSN: 1535-9476, Vol: 13, Issue: 2, Page: 621-631
2014
- 74Citations
- 106Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations74
- Citation Indexes74
- 74
- CrossRef55
- Captures106
- Readers106
- 106
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Proteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review
Anna Rainey 1, Gareth J. McKay 1, Jane English 2, Ammarin Thakkinstian 3, Alexander Peter Maxwell 1 & … Michael Corr 1 Show authors BMC
Article Description
Early transplant dysfunction and failure because of immunological and nonimmunological factors still presents a significant clinical problem for transplant recipients. A critical unmet need is the noninvasive detection and prediction of immune injury such that acute injury can be reversed by proactive immunosuppression titration. In this study, we used iTRAQ -based proteomic discovery and targeted ELISA validation to discover and validate candidate urine protein biomarkers from 262 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed allograft injury. Urine samples were randomly split into a training set of 108 patients and an independent validation set of 154 patients, which comprised the clinical biopsy-confirmed phenotypes of acute rejection (AR) ( n = 74), stable graft (STA) ( n = 74), chronic allograft injury (CAI) ( n = 58), BK virus nephritis (BKVN) ( n = 38), nephrotic syndrome (NS) ( n = 8), and healthy, normal control (HC) ( n = 10). A total of 389 proteins were measured that displayed differential abundances across urine specimens of the injury types ( p < 0.05) with a significant finding that SUMO2 (small ubiquitin-related modifier 2) was identified as a “hub” protein for graft injury irrespective of causation. Sixty-nine urine proteins had differences in abundance ( p < 0.01) in AR compared with stable graft, of which 12 proteins were up-regulated in AR with a mean fold increase of 2.8. Nine urine proteins were highly specific for AR because of their significant differences ( p < 0.01; fold increase >1.5) from all other transplant categories (HLA class II protein HLA-DRB1, KRT14, HIST1H4B, FGG, ACTB, FGB, FGA, KRT7, DPP4). Increased levels of three of these proteins, fibrinogen beta (FGB; p = 0.04), fibrinogen gamma (FGG; p = 0.03), and HLA DRB1 ( p = 0.003) were validated by ELISA in AR using an independent sample set. The fibrinogen proteins further segregated AR from BK virus nephritis (FGB p = 0.03, FGG p = 0.02), a finding that supports the utility of monitoring these urinary proteins for the specific and sensitive noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620346491; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m113.030577; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84893286386&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24335474; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33498143; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535947620346491; http://www.mcponline.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.030577; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.030577; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m113.030577; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/2/621; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/2/621.abstract; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/2/621.full.pdf; https://www.mcponline.org/content/13/2/621; https://www.mcponline.org/content/13/2/621.abstract; https://www.mcponline.org/content/mcprot/13/2/621.full.pdf; http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.030577
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know