An Unbiased Proteomic Screen Reveals Caspase Cleavage Is Positively and Negatively Regulated by Substrate Phosphorylation *
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, ISSN: 1535-9476, Vol: 13, Issue: 5, Page: 1184-1197
2014
- 32Citations
- 29Usage
- 60Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations32
- Citation Indexes32
- 32
- CrossRef24
- Usage29
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views1
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
Article Description
Post-translational modifications of proteins regulate diverse cellular functions, with mounting evidence suggesting that hierarchical cross-talk between distinct modifications may fine-tune cellular responses. For example, in apoptosis, caspases promote cell death via cleavage of key structural and enzymatic proteins that in some instances is inhibited by phosphorylation near the scissile bond. In this study, we systematically investigated how protein phosphorylation affects susceptibility to caspase cleavage using an N-terminomic strategy, namely, a modified terminal amino isotopic labeling of substrates (TAILS) workflow, to identify proteins for which caspase-catalyzed cleavage is modulated by phosphatase treatment. We validated the effects of phosphorylation on three of the identified proteins and found that Yap1 and Golgin-160 exhibit decreased cleavage when phosphorylated, whereas cleavage of MST3 was promoted by phosphorylation. Furthermore, using synthetic peptides we systematically examined the influence of phosphoserine throughout the entirety of caspase-3, -7, and -8 recognition motifs and observed a general inhibitory effect of phosphorylation even at residues considered outside the classical consensus motif. Overall, our work demonstrates a role for phosphorylation in controlling caspase-mediated cleavage and shows that N-terminomic strategies can be tailored to study cross-talk between phosphorylation and proteolysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620330966; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m113.037374; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899750481&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556848; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535947620330966; http://www.mcponline.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.037374; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.037374; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/paedpub/1558; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2566&context=paedpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m113.037374; http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.037374; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/5/1184; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/5/1184.abstract; http://www.mcponline.org/content/13/5/1184.full.pdf; https://www.mcponline.org/content/13/5/1184; https://www.mcponline.org/content/13/5/1184.abstract; https://www.mcponline.org/content/mcprot/13/5/1184.full.pdf
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know