Abundance-based Classifier for the Prediction of Mass Spectrometric Peptide Detectability Upon Enrichment (PPA) * [S]
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, ISSN: 1535-9476, Vol: 14, Issue: 2, Page: 430-440
2015
- 22Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- CrossRef22
- 21
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Article Description
The function of a large percentage of proteins is modulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs). Currently, mass spectrometry (MS) is the only proteome-wide technology that can identify PTMs. Unfortunately, the inability to detect a PTM by MS is not proof that the modification is not present. The detectability of peptides varies significantly making MS potentially blind to a large fraction of peptides. Learning from published algorithms that generally focus on predicting the most detectable peptides we developed a tool that incorporates protein abundance into the peptide prediction algorithm with the aim to determine the detectability of every peptide within a protein. We tested our tool, “ Peptide Prediction with Abundance ” (PPA), on in-house acquired as well as published data sets from other groups acquired on different instrument platforms. Incorporation of protein abundance into the prediction allows us to assess not only the detectability of all peptides but also whether a peptide of interest is likely to become detectable upon enrichment. We validated the ability of our tool to predict changes in protein detectability with a dilution series of 31 purified proteins at several different concentrations. PPA predicted the concentration dependent peptide detectability in 78% of the cases correctly, demonstrating its utility for predicting the protein enrichment needed to observe a peptide of interest in targeted experiments. This is especially important in the analysis of PTMs. PPA is available as a web-based or executable package that can work with generally applicable defaults or retrained from a pilot MS data set.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620329212; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m114.044321; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84921925151&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473088; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535947620329212; http://www.mcponline.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/mcp.M114.044321; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/mcp.M114.044321; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m114.044321; http://www.mcponline.org/content/14/2/430; http://www.mcponline.org/content/14/2/430.abstract; http://www.mcponline.org/content/14/2/430.full.pdf; https://www.mcponline.org/content/14/2/430; https://www.mcponline.org/content/14/2/430.abstract; https://www.mcponline.org/content/mcprot/14/2/430.full.pdf
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know