Molecular detection and distribution of the genera Amphidoma and Azadinium (Amphidomataceae, Dinophyceae) in the coastal waters of Aotearoa/New Zealand
New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, ISSN: 1175-8805, Vol: 57, Issue: 1, Page: 47-62
2023
- 4Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Molecular-based approaches for harmful algal bloom species, which can be difficult to identify by light microscopy, are important tools for detecting and predicting the blooms. In this study, 84 samples from Aotearoa/New Zealand coastal waters that contained Azadinium-like cells were analysed using an Amphidomataceae real-time PCR assay. Nineteen samples were positive, and 24 Azadinium-like clonal isolates were established from these samples. Subsequently, only five isolates from one sampling point were positive using the real-time PCR assay. Four of the five isolates were genetically identified as Amphidoma languida and one as Azadinium dalianense. The field samples were analysed retrospectively using the species-specific real-time PCR assays; Am. languida was detected from the temperate areas, while Az. poporum and Az. spinosum were detected at one site. Two representative strains of each species were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), including Am. languida, which is known as toxic in the previous studies, but neither produced the currently monitored azaspiracids (AZAs). These two newly recorded species for New Zealand are important findings. The results highlight the need for more information on the spatio-temporal variations of potentially toxic Amphidomataceae species and the risk of AZAs in New Zealand coastal waters.
Bibliographic Details
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know