Distributional Legacy: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Harris’s Distributional Program
Word, ISSN: 2373-5112, Vol: 70, Issue: 4, Page: 246-257
2024
- 1Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
This paper gives an overview of the influence that Zellig Harris’s paper “Distributional structure” has had on the research area of distributional semantics, a subfield of natural language processing. We trace the development of the distributional paradigm through three generations of distributional semantics models, arriving at the large language models that currently are at the forefront of public awareness on AI, and that constitute the driving force in the current AI trend. We touch upon the discussion whether the hype around large language models is warranted or not, and we argue that much of the current (philosophical) discussion around the epistemology of distributional models can be resolved by recalling the main arguments in “Distributional structure”.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know