The Rhetorical Evolution of the Alamo
Communication Quarterly, ISSN: 0146-3373, Vol: 61, Issue: 1, Page: 113-130
2013
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Alamo has become a source of great rhetorical power as the central myth of Texas. Many scholars, in fact, point to the myth of the Alamo as an explanation as to the bifurcated Anglo/Tejano social structure that exists today in the state. However, the myth used to support this structure bears little resemblance to the original event. This essay uses the Alamo to propose a rhetorical theory of mythic development that explains the general purpose through which mythic narratives evolve rhetorically over time and their subsequent impact on social structures. Drawing from the theories of Kenneth Burke, this article advances a three-part evolutionary form based on affirmation, negation, and reaffirmation to outline the progression of this myth. © 2013 Copyright Eastern Communication Association.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know