Clarification or Confusion: A Textual Analysis of ASC 842 Lease Transition Disclosures
European Accounting Review, ISSN: 1468-4497, Vol: 34, Issue: 1, Page: 57-88
2023
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We study the transition disclosures in firms’ 10-K filings preceding the mandatory adoption of Accounting Standards Codification 842 on leases. We find that ASC 842 transition disclosures become more unreadable and dissimilar the closer to adoption, potentially because the SEC guidance on transition disclosures emphasizes detail on the specifics of the standard and whether it has material effects on future financial statements. As a result, firms’ ASC 842 transition disclosures reflect an increasing amount of technical and complex language over the transition period. Firms’ increasing use of technical and complex language may not benefit all investors and the market as a whole. Based on tests of the change in analysts’ earnings forecast delay and market uncertainty in stock returns, we find that ASC 842 transition disclosures mostly favor investors with superior information processing skills. This is contrary to the statutory goal of the SEC to increase transparency for all investors who may prefer firms’ use of clear and straightforward language to describe the effects of future accounting changes.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know