Voltage gating of Shaker K channels. The effect of temperature on ionic and gating currents
Journal of General Physiology, ISSN: 0022-1295, Vol: 112, Issue: 2, Page: 223-242
1998
- 84Citations
- 90Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations84
- Citation Indexes84
- CrossRef84
- 83
- Captures90
- Readers90
- 85
Article Description
Ionic (I(i)) and gating currents (I(g)) from noninactivating Shaker H4 K channels were recorded with the cut-open oocyte voltage clamp and macropatch techniques. Steady state and kinetic properties were studied in the temperature range 2-22°C. The time course of I(i) elicited by large depolarizations consists of an initial delay followed by an exponential rise with two kinetic components. The main I(i) component is highly temperature dependent (Q > 4) and mildly voltage dependent, having a valence times the fraction of electric field (z) of 0.2-0.3 e(o). The I(g) On response obtained between -60 and 20 mV consists of a rising phase followed by a decay with fast and slow kinetic components. The main I(g) component of decay is highly temperature dependent (Q > 4) and has a z between 1.6 and 2.8 e(o) in the voltage range from -60 to -10 mV, and ~0.45 e(o) at more depolarized potentials. After a pulse to 0 mV, a variable recovery period at -50 mV reactivates the gating charge with a high temperature dependence (Q > 4). In contrast, the reactivation occurring between -90 and -50 mV has a Q = 1.2. Fluctuation analysis of ionic currents reveals that the open probability decreases 20% between 18 and 8°C and the unitary conductance has a low temperature dependence with a Q of 1.44. Plots of conductance and gating charge displacement are displaced to the left along the voltage axis when the temperature is decreased. The temperature data suggests that activation consists of a series of early steps with low enthalpic and negative entropic changes, followed by at least one step with high enthalpic and positive entropic changes, leading to final transition to the open state, which has a negative entropic change.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0031870974&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.112.2.223; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9689029; https://rupress.org/jgp/article/112/2/223/11025/Voltage-Gating-of-Shaker-K-Channels-The-Effect-of; https://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.112.2.223
Rockefeller University Press
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know