Passive evolution of galaxy clustering
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 681, Issue: 2, Page: 998-1016
2008
- 17Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We present a numerical study of the evolution of galaxy clustering when galaxies flow passively from high red-shift, respecting the continuity equation throughout. While passive flow is a special case of galaxy evolution, it allows a well-defined study of galaxy ancestry and serves as an interesting limit to be compared to nonpassive cases. We use dissipationless N-body simulations, assign galaxies to massive halos at z = 1 and 2 using various halo occupation distribution (HOD) models, and trace these galaxy particles to lower redshift while conserving their number. We find that passive flow results in an asymptotic convergence at low redshift in the HOD and in galaxy clustering on scales above ∼3 A Mpc for a wide range of initial HODs. As galaxies become less biased with respect to mass asymptotically with time, the HOD parameters evolve such that M/M decreases while α converges toward unity, where 〈N(M)〉 = exp(-M /M)[1 + (M/M)]. The satellite populations converge toward the Poisson distribution at low redshift. The convergence is robust for different number densities and is enhanced when galaxies evolve from higher redshift. We compare our results with the observed luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample from SDSS that has the same number density. We claim that if LRGs have experienced a strict passive flow, their 〈N (M)〉 should be close to a power law with an index of unity in halo mass. Discrepancies could be due to dry galaxy merging or new members arising between the initial and the final redshifts. The spatial distribution of passively flowing galaxies within halos appears on average more concentrated than the halo mass profile at low redshift. The evolution of bias for passively flowing galaxies is consistent with linear bias evolution on quasi-linear as well as large scales. © 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=53549118286&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/527553; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/527553; https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/527553; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=4a86f419-d5a5-477d-ba4d-85b43f5c6e19&ssb=40083279709&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1086%2F527553&ssi=a9baff56-8427-4d7d-a7b9-705e51adb7fa&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=00533128385762184151034208479788332&ssn=25cb1a2e6e005d8baba9d9317129fb40219d7a335505-d60e-4252-bc018b&sso=4beee478-27085ae3bbe492ea860dd05a247d708b0537d0b6c3d8c469&ssp=62249638371718852766171899182663756&ssq=95292733968215481424217913187120781572620&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMmFkMjJkNTUtYjE4Ny00NzczLTkzZGYtZDZkZjUxMzllNjY4My0xNzE4ODE3OTEzOTM3MTIxNzY4OTAzLTY3NzA0MTYyZjlkOWI2YjcxNTEwMyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDgzYWU5NTE5LTdkZmUtNGUxZi1hM2M3LTNkZjljZWE0ODcxMTE3MTg4MTc5MTM5MzcxMjE3Njg5MDMtODE1NTg1NDJmZjcxYjIzYTE1MTAzIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know