The lisa gravitational wave foreground: A study of double white dwarfs
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 717, Issue: 2, Page: 1006-1021
2010
- 134Citations
- 85Usage
- 50Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations134
- Citation Indexes134
- 134
- CrossRef66
- Usage85
- Downloads66
- Abstract Views19
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Article Description
Double white dwarfs (WDs) are expected to be a source of confusion-limited noise for the future gravitational wave observatory LISA. In a specific frequency range, this "foreground noise" is predicted to rise above the instrumental noise and hinder the detection of other types of signals, e.g., gravitational waves arising from stellar-mass objects inspiraling into massive black holes. In many previous studies, only detached populations of compact object binaries have been considered in estimating the LISA gravitational wave foreground signal. Here, we investigate the influence of compact object detached and Roche-Lobe overflow (RLOF) Galactic binaries on the shape and strength of the LISA signal. Since >99% of remnant binaries that have orbital periods within the LISA sensitivity range are WD binaries, we consider only these binaries when calculating the LISA signal. We find that the contribution of RLOF binaries to the foreground noise is negligible at low frequencies, but becomes significant at higher frequencies, pushing the frequency at which the foreground noise drops below the instrumental noise to >6mHz. We find that it is important to consider the population of mass-transferring binaries in order to obtain an accurate assessment of the foreground noise on the LISA data stream. However, we estimate that there still exists a sizeable number (∼ 11,300) of Galactic double WD binaries that will have a signal-to-noise ratio >5, and thus will be potentially resolvable with LISA. We present the LISA gravitational wave signal from the Galactic population of WD binaries, show the most important formation channels contributing to the LISA disk and bulge populations, and discuss the implications of these new findings. © 2010 The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953908565&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1006; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/717/i=2/a=1006?key=crossref.688552c5f429670b58a1f846876c387f; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/1006; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/717/i=2/a=1006/pdf; https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/pa_fac/251; https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1250&context=pa_fac; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/physics_facpub/424; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1423&context=physics_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1006; https://validate.perfdrive.com/?ssa=6bf167ee-ecd6-410e-9dd9-714e6cf4e6db&ssb=89355251435&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0004-637X%2F717%2F2%2F1006&ssi=60697e92-8427-4c27-8568-60b07ab3fe87&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=7778393365097746620770803242624326&ssn=c79e90b38e374cf98445c690d1baf95e455fdf40ebd0-0f5a-49db-bd2537&sso=c074b7f6-3716bd9c01a7c7576d5085bc57a9eec32c2fa5a0c2008cd6&ssp=80266394371659677645165979938357452&ssq=69317400450295189572171468803406422507108&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=W10=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know