SHORT GMC LIFETIMES: AN OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATE with the PdBI ARCSECOND WHIRLPOOL SURVEY (PAWS)
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 806, Issue: 1
2015
- 83Citations
- 46Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We describe and execute a novel approach to observationally estimate the lifetimes of giant molecular clouds (GMCs). We focus on the cloud population between the two main spiral arms in M51 (the inter-arm region) where cloud destruction via shear and star formation feedback dominates over formation processes. By monitoring the change in GMC number densities and properties across the inter-arm, we estimate the lifetime as a fraction of the inter-arm travel time. We find that GMC lifetimes in M51's inter-arm are finite and short, 20-30 Myr. Over most of the region under investigation shear appears to regulate the lifetime. As the shear timescale increases with galactocentric radius, we expect cloud destruction to switch primarily to feedback at larger radii. We identify a transition from shear- to feedback-dominated disruption, finding that shear is more efficient at dispersing clouds, whereas feedback transforms the population, e.g., by fragmenting high-mass clouds into lower mass pieces. Compared to the characteristic timescale for molecular hydrogen in M51, our short lifetimes suggest that gas can remain molecular while clouds disperse and reassemble. We propose that galaxy dynamics regulates the cycling of molecular material from diffuse to bound (and ultimately star-forming) objects, contributing to long observed molecular depletion times in normal disk galaxies. We also speculate that, in extreme environments like elliptical galaxies and concentrated galaxy centers, star formation can be suppressed when the shear timescale is short enough that some clouds will not survive to form stars.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84934895519&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/72; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/806/i=1/a=72?key=crossref.0990b4d2581da62001686b09f0c3880d; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/806/i=1/a=72/pdf; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/72; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/72; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=62ddeac7-bcca-4591-babd-b42755037e2b&ssb=66468232097&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0004-637X%2F806%2F1%2F72&ssi=4f64102c-8427-491d-81a6-b5d5ea760d0d&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=009713765407241981494316251006347098&ssn=1b8b1577fda97d698d6981ea954872f77b1d17f9ea44-4e1f-4e35-b23eb2&sso=1606315e-f9d9f87a371fbd877a419cc3e0825b4db1d4e3f64d561671&ssp=89797332371719347554171986509392822&ssq=18913014358344730804105699891411952642429&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMWUxYTVkMGQtYjRlNi00ZTQ0LWFmYTgtNzUxMTFmZjg0ZDlmNy0xNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1NTM3ODg0MTMwLTY1M2VmYjFiODNiNmJmOTYxNDk0MTYiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjMGI2MzM1NC00OGRkLTRjNTUtODVmZS00NzZmMjgxYzE5ZDgxNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1NTM3ODg0MTMwLWUwMzZjYTBlZDcyYzMzN2QxNDk0MTkiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know