No keplerian disk >10 AU around the protostar B335: Magnetic braking or young age?
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 812, Issue: 2
2015
- 62Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We have conducted Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) cycle 2 observations in the 1.3 mm continuum and in the CO (2-1) and SO (5-4) lines at a resolution of ∼0.″3 toward the Class 0 protostar B335. The 1.3 mm continuum, CO, and SO emission all show central compact components with sizes of ∼40-180 AU within more extended components. The CO component shows signs of infalling and rotational motion. By fitting simple kinematic models to the CO data, the protostellar mass is estimated to be 0.05 The specific angular momentum, on a 100 AU scale, is (4.3 � 0.5) � 10 km s pc. A similar specific angular momentum, (3-5) � 10 km s pc, is measured on a 10 AU scale from the velocity gradient observed in the central SO component, and there is no clear sign of an infalling motion in the SO emission. By comparing the infalling and rotational motion, our ALMA results suggest that the observed rotational motion has not yet reached Keplerian velocity neither on a 100 AU nor even on a 10 AU scale. Consequently, the radius of the Keplerian disk in B335 (if present) is expected to be 1-3 AU. The expected disk radius in B335 is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than those of observed Keplerian disks around other Class 0 protostars. Based on the observed infalling and rotational motion from 0.1 pc to inner 100 AU scales, there are two possible scenarios to explain the presence of such a small Keplerian disk in B335: magnetic braking and young age. If our finding is the consequence of magnetic braking, ∼50% of the angular momentum of the infalling material within a 1000 AU scale might have been removed, and the magnetic field strength on a 1000 AU scale is estimated to be ∼200 μG. If it is young age, the infalling radius in B335 is estimated to be ∼2700 AU, corresponding to a collapsing timescale of ∼5 � 10 years.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946014693&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/129; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/129; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/812/i=2/a=129/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/812/i=2/a=129?key=crossref.b4bb27505b40225f8039a60330dc12ce; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/129; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=6ffdbb3d-27c8-446f-acbb-48c96c721934&ssb=45845227354&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0004-637X%2F812%2F2%2F129&ssi=7972a18f-cnvj-4570-8723-571d634b9761&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=479871363494581917810096806271462392&ssn=8524be94f7fa4cdce1ec866f3dfbe8ea18790900c3c4-8990-4f21-a5e26a&sso=db03ef8c-bc564dd29dea227346c9f96f2c72eb57b1c4a4b7aa65dcb5&ssp=67126407231726583837172709538959109&ssq=51053438920925973709029239925371824664075&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlOC0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTU5OTcwMzAxLWFjZjU4YTgzNzk1MDA0Y2Q3ODA3NTQiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTU5OTcwMzAxLWU1ZGQ2MjRhMDcyZWQzY2E3ODA4MzgiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know