Characterization of a layer stack by wavelet analysis on X-ray reflectivity data
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, ISSN: 0022-3727, Vol: 33, Issue: 15, Page: 1757-1763
2000
- 24Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
X-ray reflectometry allows the determination of the thickness, density, absorption and rms roughness of a stack of thin layers on a substrate from several nanometres to some hundred nanometres. Inversion of the experimental reflectivity data is usually realized by a trial-and-error method based on the theoretical computation of the reflectivity curve after having extracted initial values of the layer thicknesses from the result of a classical FFT of the reflectivity data. However, the order information of the layers is lost during classical FFT. The order of the layers then has to be known a priori. Besides, the classical Fourier transform does not reveal anything about the stack parameters (density, absorption and the rms roughness). As this trial-and-error method is efficient provided that one has a good idea of the stack parameter values, it is important to extract some valuable information directly from the experimental reflectivity. In this paper, it will be shown that the order of the layers can be obtained by the so-called joint time-frequency representations. Furthermore, the continuous wavelet transform allows qualitative determination of the stack parameters and helps in the determination of an appropriate starting model for the trial-and-error method. The points of interest of this method are illustrated by experimental examples.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034247480&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/15/301; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0022-3727/33/15/301; http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3727/33/i=15/a=301/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/15/301; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=214d7b53-c252-454b-a87d-18f586bd1af0&ssb=02944296732&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0022-3727%2F33%2F15%2F301&ssi=eefe0f1e-8427-4997-9ff2-da311a065ac1&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=85816418503261518468340567986916601&ssn=b42a4dae4646252574e36a27ffc53de36a6ee7e44089-5b4c-4bba-9caad6&sso=f2d6b80e-62ddb6055d96a9905c6108df85e1e345a87d5e4a74c61b35&ssp=80824870441722134438172232941030468&ssq=20069276713102496135796580527872548650766&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3NmNmYmIwZC1hOTY5LTQwMjItYWM3My04NjU0NDg0NTczMTgxNzIyMTk2NTgwNDk0MTcwNTUwOTQ4LTRmYWIzZmViMDk4YjliM2U0NjgzMSIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA1ZmViNjE3Ny05MmVkLTRmNTYtOGZlMS01OTlkOWM5MmM0MTUzLTE3MjIxOTY1ODA0OTQxNzA1NTA5NDgtMGZhNDI4ODk3OWJhN2FmZTQ2ODI4In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know