Report of the key comparison CCQM-K108 Determination of arsenic species, total arsenic and cadmium in brown rice flour
Metrologia, ISSN: 1681-7575, Vol: 52, Issue: 1 A, Page: 08005-08005
2015
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The CCQM-K108 key comparison was organised by the Inorganic Analysis Working Group (IAWG) of CCQM to test the abilities of the national metrology institutes (NMIs) or the designated institutes (DIs) to measure the mass fractions of arsenic species, total arsenic and cadmium in brown rice flour. The National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) acted as the coordinating laboratory. The participants used different measurement methods, though most of them used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) or isotope-dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ID-ICP-MS) for Cd and ICP-MS for total arsenic. Regarding arsenic speciation, all participants used ICP-MS coupled with liquid chromatography (LC). Accounting for relative expanded uncertainty, comparability of measurement results for each of total arsenic and cadmium was successfully demonstrated by the participating NMIs or DIs for the measurement of the measurand at the level of less than 0.5 mg/kg. Regarding arsenic species (inorganic arsenic and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAA)), there is, however, a remaining problem to be solved. It is expected that arsenic, cadmium and other metals at mass fractions greater than approximately 0.1 mg/kg in rice flour can be determined by each participant using the same technique(s) employed for this key comparison to achieve similar uncertainties mentioned in the present report. Furthermore, the results of this key comparison can be utilised along with the IAWG core capability approach.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042608268&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/1a/08005; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/52/1A/08005; http://stacks.iop.org/0026-1394/52/i=1A/a=08005/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/0026-1394/52/i=1A/a=08005?key=crossref.3e827b638d8ff88f1d4b34eca357fac5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/1a/08005; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=e6afbd3a-b6d2-4246-b0a6-e1e97916142c&ssb=28855222815&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0026-1394%2F52%2F1A%2F08005&ssi=ba2facf9-cnvj-43b3-b2b1-116a77adc590&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=07625339998994786507942986449064571&ssn=5f25a2739f0c3882184c7547374c511c6bf01bcddbfa-b2e6-4a73-988d46&sso=efeb611c-e6be62910580407de80e358f10345ea412f1c8dc31a811bb&ssp=48395603451739334613173984401980803&ssq=67332313260828351891479322486866485888105&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3Nzc5OWExMy1kOTFlLTQwODctYjJiZC05ODQ4ZDkxOTRhNjMxNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0NDUzMjg1Nzg3LTRjNjVkMTk5NzM2YWUxNDU1MDc5MSIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA4NzNkZjhmYy0wMGRkLTQzMjctOGVkZi1lZTQ3YWUwMmI3MGQ2LTE3MzkzNzkzMjI5MjQ0NTMyODU3ODctNTI0MGUxOTFkOGE1MWFjZjUwNzkxIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know