Monte Carlo based treatment planning for modulated electron beam radiation therapy
Physics in Medicine and Biology, ISSN: 0031-9155, Vol: 46, Issue: 8, Page: 2177-2199
2001
- 39Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef34
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 33
Article Description
A Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) is presented. This new variation of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) utilizes an electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) to deliver non-uniform intensity maps at several electron energies. In this way, conformal dose distributions are delivered to irregular targets located a few centimetres below the surface while sparing deeper-lying normal anatomy. Planning for MERT begins with Monte Carlo generation of electron beamlets. Electrons are transported with proper in-air scattering and the dose is tallied in the phantom for each beamlet. An optimized beamlet plan may be calculated using inverse-planning methods. Step-and-shoot leaf sequences are generated for the intensity maps and dose distributions recalculated using Monte Carlo simulations. Here, scatter and leakage from the leaves are properly accounted for by transporting electrons through the eMLC geometry. The weights for the segments of the plan are re-optimized with the leaf positions fixed and bremsstrahlung leakage and electron scatter doses included. This optimization gives the final optimized plan. It is shown that a significant portion of the calculation time is spent transporting particles in the leaves. However, this is necessary since optimizing segment weights based on a model in which leaf transport is ignored results in an improperly optimized plan with overdosing of target and critical structures. A method of rapidly calculating the bremsstrahlung contribution is presented and shown to be an efficient solution to this problem. A homogeneous model target and a 2D breast plan are presented. The potential use of this tool in clinical planning is discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034879485&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/8/310; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11512618; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/46/8/310; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/8/310; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=a09a21fb-3d99-41f2-ad10-cb95577b7f07&ssb=53119290897&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F46%2F8%2F310&ssi=7636db99-cnvj-4b1f-80e7-0ab7279588d0&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=96297482774110967371233016044177350&ssn=66d9fd2fac3efa0911467ae8e990d478cf6dfe105911-65fe-48dc-82e54a&sso=0e126150-9319bfde79b5bfde882ad4ff4744d580e816269e66a1c695&ssp=28074592351726295598172638760612529&ssq=00948344369464882058263731023898218132366&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMzZjZDcxYjQtYzE1Yy00OTVhLWFjNjEtNTM4YWIxMWM0ZjdhMi0xNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwNzk5NjI4OTItOWFkMjA5MjUxMzVlMGJlNjM3MTIwIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwZmNjYzc0MTgtZmMxYi00YzZhLTgzMGEtYjI2OWJmMTVjOTUyMTcyNjI2MzczMTQ0MDc5OTYyODkyLTE5ZGJkZTFkMTg5ZmE4MGEzNzEyMCJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know