Monte Carlo dosimetry for forthcoming clinical trials in X-ray microbeam radiation therapy
Physics in Medicine and Biology, ISSN: 0031-9155, Vol: 55, Issue: 15, Page: 4375-4388
2010
- 42Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef33
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
The purpose of this work is to define safe irradiation protocols in microbeam radiation therapy. The intense synchrotron-generated x-ray beam used for the treatment is collimated and delivered in an array of 50 μm-sized rectangular fields with a centre-to-centre distance between microplanes of 400 μm. The absorbed doses received by the tumour and the healthy tissues in a human head phantom have been assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations. The identification of safe dose limits is carried out by evaluating the maximum peak and valley doses achievable in the tumour while keeping the valley doses in the healthy tissues under tolerances. As the skull receives a significant fraction of the dose, the dose limits are referred to this tissue. Dose distributions with high spatial resolution are presented for various tumour positions, skull thicknesses and interbeam separations. Considering a unidirectional irradiation (field size of 2×2 cm) and a centrally located tumour, the largest peak and valley doses achievable in the tumour are 55 Gy and 2.6 Gy, respectively. The corresponding maximum valley doses received by the skin, bone and healthy brain are 4 Gy, 14 Gy and 7 Gy (doses in one fraction), respectively, i.e. within tolerances (5% probability of complication within 5 years). © 2010 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Printed in the UK.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78049436575&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/15/012; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647606; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/55/15/012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/15/012; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=9f7cb53a-69d6-4909-b6b9-b23733a761cb&ssb=66223201350&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F55%2F15%2F012&ssi=f0a19439-cnvj-4d70-a1be-5ce189a6dfa0&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=39598786676959497378136777352176639&ssn=949ae27c223700152ef1024186c756726b3afe105911-65fe-48dc-83d148&sso=5f614150-9319bfde79b52154a3e2896c544ce9c1927497a00f9dc01b&ssp=84274831831726291402172636019885531&ssq=15450444378416035859963731516958767592721&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMzZjZDcxYjQtYzE1Yy00OTVhLWFjNjEtNTM4YWIxMWM0ZjdhMi0xNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwODAwNTMyMjgtMjRjMTk5OGM1YTQ5NmM3MzM3ODEwIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwZmNjYzc0MTgtZmMxYi00YzZhLTgzMGEtYjI2OWJmMTVjOTUyMTcyNjI2MzczMTQ0MDgwMDUzMjI4LTk2Zjk4ZWY1MjZmYWJlZDQzNzgxMCJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know