On the choice of the density matrix in the stochastic TMRG
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, ISSN: 0305-4470, Vol: 34, Issue: 38, Page: 7769-7782
2001
- 23Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In applications of the density matrix renormalization group to nonhermitean problems, the choice of the density matrix is not uniquely prescribed by the algorithm. We demonstrate that for the recently introduced stochastic transfer matrix DMRG (stochastic TMRG) the necessity to use open boundary conditions makes asymmetrical reduced density matrices, as used for renormalization in quantum TMRG, an inappropriate choice. An explicit construction of the largest left and right eigenvectors of the full transfer matrix allows us to show why symmetrical density matrices are the correct physical choice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035965159&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/38/305; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/34/38/305; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/38/305; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=c61a2eeb-2173-4572-b82e-919a494a15e6&ssb=32963284071&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0305-4470%2F34%2F38%2F305&ssi=13c7de2b-8427-481d-9ffe-0f6060902bea&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=87105391267854032848411566006544520&ssn=a3bd9aae45cd085047acc4c64dfa530f2397a842bdc0-9b7b-4e59-b1bc3e&sso=a845e0fa-9e3578620ac4da69abb64ba5e5eaf3b7514231e7d697a726&ssp=86208014361719952168172010343104793&ssq=51698775468381027751941132691437763012591&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwZWQ3OGYyMmMtODkyYi00NTZhLWFmZTItMzg4OWE4YzkyNDE0NC0xNzE5OTQxMTMyNTY0MjEzNTUxMzkwLTNiMTYwOWRkNTE2MWIyOGM4NDgzNSIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGIzYTMwMWU3LWYyNWUtNGQzOS05NDRiLWFiOWE4ZjQ0OTBjNjE3MTk5NDExMzI1NjQyMTM1NTEzOTAtMjk0MmJkOGQ5ZGEyYzdiNjg0ODM1In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know