Experimental comparison of statistical and spatio-temporal probe diagnostics
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, ISSN: 0741-3335, Vol: 49, Issue: 10, Page: 1707-1718
2007
- 5Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Experiments on plasma turbulence and related transport processes generally require diagnostics with high spatio-temporal resolution. Standard tools for this purpose are statistical methods like cross-correlation analysis or conditional averaging. High spatial resolution is achieved at the expense of an asynchronous recording and a subsequent averaging process. Recently, we had shown that diagnostics arrays in combination with a super-resolution algorithm can achieve a comparably high spatial resolution [1]. This paper compares the results of both techniques applied to identical experimental conditions. It addresses the question of whether the higher efforts for spatio-temporal diagnostics are needed to study the dynamics of large-scale structures in a turbulent system and to what extent the results of statistical approaches are reliable. © 2007 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34748836596&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/10/008; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/49/10/008; http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/49/i=10/a=008/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/10/008; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=4f4dfaa6-aeaa-4454-840a-9fb084247027&ssb=99876289615&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0741-3335%2F49%2F10%2F008&ssi=66be0d44-cnvj-4d90-a303-7354f51a64f8&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=543565683324296892355192434756996142&ssn=44f754a38c5016e15ffd7d081301a187fad6fe105911-65fe-48dc-80029a&sso=4e576150-9319bfde79b550d74a6953ed5bcb6b95385e6c3e01f2b166&ssp=21515550221726233758172647473087017&ssq=19360887518715431629663731953596775785269&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMzZjZDcxYjQtYzE1Yy00OTVhLWFjNjEtNTM4YWIxMWM0ZjdhNC0xNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwMjExNDU2MjY0LWY2ZWNmZTZlYThjODIyYmQyMzU0NTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBmY2NjNzQxOC1mYzFiLTRjNmEtODMwYS1iMjY5YmYxNWM5NTIxNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwMjExNDU2MjY0LTcxYmJhZDA2YWYyMDc5MTAyMzU0NjUifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know