Superconducting and hybrid systems for magnetic field shielding
Superconductor Science and Technology, ISSN: 1361-6668, Vol: 29, Issue: 3
2016
- 19Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper we investigate and compare the shielding properties of superconducting and hybrid superconducting/ferromagnetic systems, consisting of cylindrical cups with an aspect ratio of height/radius close to unity. First, we reproduced, by finite-element calculations, the induction magnetic field values measured along the symmetry axis in a superconducting (MgB) and in a hybrid configuration (MgB/Fe) as a function of the applied magnetic field and of the position. The calculations are carried out using the vector potential formalism, taking into account simultaneously the non-linear properties of both the superconducting and the ferromagnetic material. On the basis of the good agreement between the experimental and the computed data we apply the same model to study the influence of the geometric parameters of the ferromagnetic cup as well as of the thickness of the lateral gap between the two cups on the shielding properties of the superconducting cup. The results show that in the considered non-ideal geometry, where the edge effect in the flux penetration cannot be disregarded, the superconducting shield is always the most efficient solution at low magnetic fields. However, a partial recovery of the shielding capability of the hybrid configuration occurs if a mismatch in the open edges of the two cups is considered. In contrast, at high magnetic fields the hybrid configurations are always the most effective. In particular, the highest shielding factor was found for solutions with the ferromagnetic cup protruding over the superconducting one.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959569209&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/29/3/034004; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-2048/29/3/034004; http://stacks.iop.org/0953-2048/29/i=3/a=034004/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/0953-2048/29/i=3/a=034004?key=crossref.c97b10efcfd17d07d555c7f75f1abf5f; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/29/3/034004; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=9c8b38d2-ff34-407b-9378-f0d09563a512&ssb=23074296980&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0953-2048%2F29%2F3%2F034004&ssi=eaccdad7-8427-4efd-830d-0222e031f86c&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=141677181049582031147363894195694081&ssn=57d745977cb08144b377c3c98e4d25371b52e7e44089-5b4c-4bba-9ed23a&sso=8890480e-62ddb6055d9630d0c55ce130b276f307ba9d3d174963dd1d&ssp=30955750811722151926172230506146814&ssq=52777528921930556383096580052963602367913&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNWZlYjYxNzctOTJlZC00ZjU2LThmZTEtNTk5ZDljOTJjNDE1NC0xNzIyMTk2NTgwNDk0MTkyNjM4OTQ2LTkyYzMwNWRjYjIzZjEwYWUxMTQ3MDkiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3NmNmYmIwZC1hOTY5LTQwMjItYWM3My04NjU0NDg0NTczMTgxNzIyMTk2NTgwNDk0MTkyNjM4OTQ2LTg4YWZhYmI1Zjg3ZGM1ZGIxMTQ3MTgifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know