Old and new physics interpretations of the NuTeV anomaly
Journal of High Energy Physics, ISSN: 1029-8479, Vol: 6, Issue: 2, Page: 749-775
2002
- 112Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We discuss whether the NuTeV anomaly can be explained, compatibly with all other data, by QCD effects (maybe, if the strange sea is asymmetric, or there is a tiny violation of isospin), new physics in propagators or couplings of the vector bosons (not really), loops of supersymmetric particles (no), dimension six operators (yes, for one specific SU(2)-invariant operator), leptoquarks (not in a minimal way), extra U(1) gauge bosons (maybe: an unmixed Z′ coupled to B - 3L also increases the muon g - 2 by about 10 and gives a 'burst' to cosmic rays above the GZK cutoff). © SISSA/ISAS 2002.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=23044493802&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/037; http://stacks.iop.org/1126-6708/2002/i=02/a=037?key=crossref.b7be6e0363a1f33b48a481c9c1c6e5d7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/037; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=3034b996-9819-49d9-b8ee-a55ee9db1749&ssb=66437298285&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1126-6708%2F2002%2F02%2F037&ssi=109aa821-cnvj-4da8-97cd-f9465c59ca2b&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=351951097778792281137551829139888562&ssn=9c8f6c302923b3c1e08e53eddcef3017b379e3e449d9-548a-4c5b-977f39&sso=e5ac7caf-f497241c935fc0eb497d55afc9ff4bb7b37d9ebddf1fee19&ssp=25276169891732132760173279232107941&ssq=63353436837320996742026405170677525821758&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwZWUyZGRiODMtZjY4Ny00ZGY4LTliMTMtNDQ0OWIzZDhjZjczOS0xNzMyMTI2NDA1MjY2NjQxOTY4MzQ4LThlNGUxOTdkZTM5MTBhMmMxMTM3MjgiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAyZTQ0OWQzYi0wMjNiLTQ3MjYtYjI4YS1kNDQ1MTk1NzZhNDUxNzMyMTI2NDA1MjY2NjQxOTY4MzQ4LTRhY2QzZDdiZmRkNTZiMzgxMTM3MzQiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know