A note on (meta)stable brane configurations in MQCD
Journal of High Energy Physics, ISSN: 1029-8479, Vol: 2006, Issue: 11, Page: 088-088
2006
- 86Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
We examine the M-theory version of SQCD which is known as MQCD. In the IIA limit, this theory appears to have a supersymmetry-breaking brane configuration which corresponds to the meta-stable state of script N sign = 1 SU(N ) SQCD. However, the behavior at infinity of this non-supersymmetric brane construction differs from that of the supersymmetric ground state of MQCD. We interpret this to mean that it is not a meta-stable state in MQCD, but rather a state in another theory. This provides a concrete example of the fact that, while MQCD accurately describes the supersymmetric features of SCQD, it fails to reproduce its non-supersymmetric features (such as meta-stable states) not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. © SISSA 2006.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846197134&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/088; http://stacks.iop.org/1126-6708/2006/i=11/a=088?key=crossref.463c46a85212fcc6e4f3c50562d633e4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/088; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=bba195a2-114c-463b-88be-a2dcdec3efe2&ssb=37489210918&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1126-6708%2F2006%2F11%2F088&ssi=c985413d-cnvj-4234-9d93-503c9954bde8&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81571594600296259591167655781668379&ssn=898f85ff1125d18391035b86f91b7e08d52253ab38ba-3ef6-47ad-8915cb&sso=bea0b65f-e46e90490974de0d17c63118c076405de83b5d4e0aea7436&ssp=55051394771727807239172849705860051&ssq=90614022000993495027192155593496254547010&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwOWQ3Y2Y5NDYtMWMyNi00MDJkLWE3NjktYzZjODI2ZTBiYzI4Ny0xNzI3ODkyMTU1NzU2NTI3ODU0MDc1LTMyYzM3NzE5NjNhNmM4ZTg1OTExMyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGMzNzk3NmE2LTY5ODgtNDllYi1hM2JkLWFhMjI5M2Q2ZTY5ZjE3Mjc4OTIxNTU3NTY1Mjc4NTQwNzUtOTZmMzk4MmNmYzI1MmJkYjU5MTE2IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know