The analytical approach in testing the Kaniadakis cosmology
Classical and Quantum Gravity, ISSN: 1361-6382, Vol: 41, Issue: 20
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
We know that a quantum-corrected cosmological scenario can emerge based on its corrected Friedmann equations corresponding to the corrected entropy of cosmic-horizon using the gravity-thermodynamics conjecture in deriving those equations. In this right, the Kaniadakis entropy associated with the apparent horizon of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) Universe leads to a corrected Friedmann equation which contains a correction term as Ω K a = α ( H 2 + k a 2 ) − 1 H 2 where α ≡ K 2 π 2 2 G 2 (K is the Kaniadakis parameter). Here, we derive the analytical relations between the energy density parameters Ω m , Ω Λ (and the ratio density Ω of correction term) and the geometrical cosmological parameters { q , j } . This leads to getting Ω K a = j − 1 4 ( q + 1 ) 2 − ( j − 1 ) which enables us to put constrains on Ω K a 0 using the measurable parameters { q 0 , j 0 } and H. It also reveals some interesting aspects of the Kaniadakis cosmology by explaining that the correction term plays different roles both in the presence and in the absence of the cosmological constant Λ. This term plays the role of dark energy in the absence of the cosmological constant Λ, while in the presence of this component, it plays the role of a small correction to dark energy. The value of Ω then determines the amount of the deviation of Kaniadakis model from the concordance ΛCDM model. As a result, the value of j is found to be close to unit for vanishing cosmological constant Λ = 0 and the maximum value of Ω K a 0 ; thereby we get ( j 0 − 1 ) ≃ 0.137 and ( j 0 − 1 ) ≃< 10 − 3 for the case of Λ = 0 and Λ ≠ 0 , respectively. That is, the jerk parameter j can be used as a useful tool to test the Kaniadakis cosmology using the observational studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85205264340&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad789f; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/ad789f; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad789f; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=18e66bd4-7c54-4479-910a-8da9c489e4c2&ssb=37598241938&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6382%2Fad789f&ssi=d0f9c973-cnvj-4a34-9bbe-112c8f8c233f&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=4149899492066581872824675012221364&ssn=cc23253e2c270d1abbf01798a1b34b23bd0f53ab38ba-3ef6-47ad-89a124&sso=6a3d365f-e46e90490974d41fa0fb609f727d268f683c313e3e1ef986&ssp=49902993511727835389172792074424597&ssq=52684446658925646351692155806564359561075&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwOWQ3Y2Y5NDYtMWMyNi00MDJkLWE3NjktYzZjODI2ZTBiYzI4Mi0xNzI3ODkyMTU1NzU2NzQ0MzM5MTAtMTFkYzI4YTQ0NjllMWRlZDcyODIiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjMzc5NzZhNi02OTg4LTQ5ZWItYTNiZC1hYTIyOTNkNmU2OWYxNzI3ODkyMTU1NzU2NzQ0MzM5MTAtMGUxODMwNjViNjg2ODJhNDcyODIifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know