Growth kinetics of Ga InP nanowires using triethylgallium as Ga precursor
Nanotechnology, ISSN: 1361-6528, Vol: 29, Issue: 39, Page: 394001
2018
- 10Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef4
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
Ga InP nanowire arrays are promising for various optoelectronic applications with a tunable band-gap over a wide range. In particular, they are well suited as the top cell in tandem junction solar cell devices. So far, most Ga InP nanowires have been synthesized by the use of trimethylgallium (TMGa). However, particle assisted nanowire growth in metal organic vapor phase epitaxy is typically carried out at relatively low temperatures, where TMGa is not fully pyrolysed. In this work, we developed the growth of Ga InP nanowires using triethylgallium (TEGa) as the Ga precursor, which reduced Ga precursor consumption by about five times compared to TMGa due to the lower homogeneous pyrolysis temperature of TEGa. The versatility of TEGa is shown by synthesis of high yield Ga InP nanowire arrays, with a material composition tunable by the group III input flows, as verified by x-ray diffraction measurements and photoluminescence characterization. The growth dynamics of Ga InP nanowires was assessed by varying the input growth precursor molar fractions and growth temperature, using hydrogen-chloride as in situ etchant. We observed a complex interplay between the precursors. First, trimethylindium (TMIn) inhibits Ga incorporation into the nanowires, resulting in higher In composition in the grown nanowires than in the vapor. Second, the growth rate increases with temperature, indicating a kinetically limited growth, which from nanowire effective binary volume growth rates of InP and GaP can be attributed to the synthesis of GaP in Ga InP. We observed that phosphine has a strong effect on the nanowire growth rate with behavior expected for a unimolecular Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism of pyrolysis on a catalytic surface. However, growth rates increase strongly with both TEGa and TMIn precursors as well, indicating the complexity of vapor-liquid-solid growth for ternary materials. One precursor can affect the decomposition of another, and each precursor can affect the wetting properties and catalytic activity of the metal particle.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050659201&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aad1d2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29979150; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6528/aad1d2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aad1d2; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=5360539b-1bdc-4179-8a41-d129ada440c8&ssb=83654284073&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6528%2Faad1d2&ssi=1a02ce26-cnvj-4056-8850-28eee45c9e6c&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=4256110473449321640150523767346002&ssn=b8f648c7ad2876c06c1ac966d3fa89ac3289765553ad-d587-4971-88caf0&sso=f0543a66-0a667121c17a73b7deb8cb2a0551b4b4227bfcd4ee2f4048&ssp=61852959501734334618173440532140202&ssq=94208171240470655641470207057536948960264&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNTliYWMzNmYtYzI0Mi00MmUwLWI4Y2ItNTMzOGQ0YWJiOGIyMi0xNzM0MzcwMjA3OTY2NDIxOTYzOTEtZDM3ZjMxM2Q0NmU1MWYwNzQwMTUiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBhYWEwODA3OS0yYjZmLTQzMWUtYWIwYi1iMzU3NDJlZTczNmYxNzM0MzcwMjA3OTY2NDIxOTYzOTEtYWJhNGM2ZTRmMmJkNDExNTQwMTUifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know