Carbon ion beam dosimetry in magnetic fields using Farmer-type ionization chambers of different radii: measurements and simulations
Physics in Medicine and Biology, ISSN: 1361-6560, Vol: 69, Issue: 20
2024
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective. To investigate magnetic field effects on the dose distribution and ionization chambers response in carbon ion reference fields and determine magnetic field correction factors for chambers of different volumes. Approach. The response of six Farmer-type chambers with varying radii (1-6 mm, termed as R1-R6) was measured in magnetic fields up to 1 T in 0.1 T increments using an experimental electromagnet and compared with Monte Carlo simulations. Chamber readings were measured in the entrance region of a monoenergetic carbon ion beam of 390.75 MeV u. A lower energy of 200.28 MeV u was applied to chamber R3 for comparison. Polarity and recombination corrections were investigated for the R3 chamber. The local dose change induced by the magnetic field was calculated by Monte Carlo, which together with change of the chamber’s response, was used to calculate the final magnetic field correction factors. Main results. The dependence of the chamber response on the magnetic field was non-linear and volume-dependent. Maximum changes ranged from 0.30% (R4) to 0.62% (R5) at 0.2 T. For R3, the response for the lower energy was systematically decreased by 0.2% in the range of 0.2 T to 0.7 T. No significant effect of the magnetic field on polarity and ion recombination correction was found. The maximum variation of the local dose was found to be (0.03 ± 0.08) % at 0.2 T for beam energy of 390.75 MeV u. Magnetic field correction factors for the different chambers ranged from 0.28% (R4) to 0.60% (R5). Significance. This study provides the first detailed analysis of chambers’ response to magnetic flux densities of up to 1 T using chambers of different radii and comparison with simulations. By combining the chamber response alterations with local dose changes magnetic field correction factors were calculated for all six chambers, including the commercial Farmer-type chamber.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206396611&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad67a5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39053512; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ad67a5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad67a5; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=f3ad9ffa-c1b3-40ba-bcc0-412355ca0d5a&ssb=72326268407&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6560%2Fad67a5&ssi=c8a22a4e-cnvj-4229-a8f6-29e39d867515&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=537107588089573511081483034277872856&ssn=347c03364c77790d872c5df901d98fe6d02a6402f074-4cb6-43cc-be8da4&sso=850095d5-86644739f8a5220375e0c41ad56fd8a95f1c46adfdd24af0&ssp=41742287731728619237172939449253103&ssq=41433897565759919050075883155579403214579&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTkwYjQzMC04NzFlLTRjOGEtODhjNS1hOTI5ZGQ5NTBhYzkxNzI4Njc1ODgzNDM1Njk5NzczODc0LTFiYTI4YjM4MTg4OGZiZGQxMDgxMzkiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNTIwMjU5NjctODczMS00OWRlLTg2NDgtY2NlNTViOWU0YmFjOS0xNzI4Njc1ODgzNDM2Njk5NzczODczLTQzNDZkNDMyZDRkNzYzYjUxMDgxMzYifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know