Is there a need for individualized adjustment of electrode belt position during EIT-guided titration of positive end-expiratory pressure?
Physiological Measurement, ISSN: 1361-6579, Vol: 43, Issue: 6
2022
- 10Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef3
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the variation of tidal volume-to-impedance ratio (V T/Z T) during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurement. Approach. Forty-two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed. An incremental and subsequently a decremental PEEP trial were performed with steps of 2 cm H2O and duration of 2 min per step during volume-controlled ventilation with decelerating flow. EIT measurement was conducted in the 5th intercostal space and V T was recorded simultaneously. The variation of V T/Z T (RatioV) was defined as the changes in percentage to average ratio per cm H2O PEEP change. A z-score > 1 was considered as a significant variation and an implication that the measurement plane was inadequate. Main results. The RatioV of 42 patients was 1.29 ± 0.80%·cm H2O-1. A z-score of 1 corresponded to the variation of 2.09%·cm H2O-1. Seven patients (16.7%) had a z-score > 1 and showed either positive or negative correlation between the volume-to-impedance ratio and PEEP. Significance. Electrode placement at 5th intercostal space might not be ideal for every individual during EIT measurement. Evaluation of volume-to-impedance ratio variation is necessary for patients undergoing maneuvers with wide alteration in absolute lung volume.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133214972&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac73d6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617942; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/ac73d6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac73d6; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=e52ae3e3-0937-421e-a6d4-ae6d52b510d3&ssb=12223254130&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6579%2Fac73d6&ssi=856aff87-cnvj-42ab-a147-83f02d4e4cdb&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=29662532231359894635086278404977648&ssn=0ab451b41ed19a7422932f7520cd3437a7ff1f051b2d-009f-4552-874c6b&sso=32657fee-8795a652685740235da40e4daf523ac109b39077b5d750a1&ssp=52359708801733915363173419887900171&ssq=90677841313716983277038547168388093706267&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjRkYjliNjAtM2U0MS00YTA5LTg0MmQtMDEzOTlhYWJkOTI5My0xNzMzOTM4NTQ3NjEzMTc0NTg5NDQwLWJhYTRkY2YyNDg1ODEzYmM2MzUwOCIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGMwMzU4NmNkLTYwNmQtNDg2Yy1hZDE0LTMxNDc2M2JiOGI5ODE3MzM5Mzg1NDc2MTMxNzQ1ODk0NDAtMWMzOWY1ZDgyMDY0YTg5MjYzNTA4In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know