The truth Hertz—synchronization of electroencephalogram signals with physiological waveforms recorded in an intensive care unit
Physiological Measurement, ISSN: 1361-6579, Vol: 44, Issue: 8
2023
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Objective. The ability to synchronize continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) signals with physiological waveforms such as electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive pressures, photoplethysmography and other signals can provide meaningful insights regarding coupling between brain activity and other physiological subsystems. Aligning these datasets is a particularly challenging problem because device clocks handle time differently and synchronization protocols may be undocumented or proprietary. Approach. We used an ensemble-based model to detect the timestamps of heartbeat artefacts from ECG waveforms recorded from inpatient bedside monitors and from cEEG signals acquired using a different device. Vectors of inter-beat intervals were matched between both datasets and robust linear regression was applied to measure the relative time offset between the two datasets as a function of time. Main Results. The timing error between the two unsynchronized datasets ranged between −84 s and +33 s (mean 0.77 s, median 4.31 s, IQR25-4.79 s, IQR75 11.38s). Application of our method improved the relative alignment to within ± 5ms for more than 61% of the dataset. The mean clock drift between the two datasets was 418.3 parts per million (ppm) (median 414.6 ppm, IQR25 411.0 ppm, IQR75 425.6 ppm). A signal quality index was generated that described the quality of alignment for each cEEG study as a function of time. Significance. We developed and tested a method to retrospectively time-align two clinical waveform datasets acquired from different devices using a common signal. The method was applied to 33,911h of signals collected in a paediatric critical care unit over six years, demonstrating that the method can be applied to long-term recordings collected under clinical conditions. The method can account for unknown clock drift rates and the presence of discontinuities caused by clock resynchronization events.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85167480941&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ace49e; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37406636; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/ace49e; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ace49e; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=686e7089-73df-4b42-86f5-2eca18075628&ssb=91969272286&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6579%2Face49e&ssi=6b66f5aa-cnvj-4b04-a013-e88087b7ce91&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81271736538086495180584869509338875&ssn=30b41c581a65a59234b417efe90030a82267a9a60fcd-2cb2-4007-b6a9d1&sso=d919edc1-99effaea85e1c51056dae84135984c946ca7c024a5a70332&ssp=53082304691736986477173712569295373&ssq=82946978444582738019109927960473669980298&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBiN2M0MmExZC00ZTg0LTRjOGYtYmRhYi1lOWM0NzEyM2ZjZjQxNzM2OTA5OTI3Mjc3Mjc0NTE4NjQ0LTVmYmVhZDk5NjMzNDUxOWUxODA1OCIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAwOGQ5ZmRhZC05ZjExLTQ4YjEtYWFhNy04ODNjNDU0MzU0ZTI0LTE3MzY5MDk5MjcyNzcyNzQ1MTg2NDUtMWNiYWI4ZGM3MmU5ZWQ2MDE4MDU4IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know