Improved analog performance of FDSOI based NCFET with a ferroelectric-paraelectric-dielectric gate stack
Semiconductor Science and Technology, ISSN: 1361-6641, Vol: 37, Issue: 10
2022
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With the superior analog/RF performance of planar device architectures such as fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FDSOI) MOSFETs, it becomes important to investigate the impact of a ferroelectric material in the gate stack, resulting in negative capacitance (NC) behavior, on the device performance. In this work, through calibrating the FDSOI MOSFET (as the baseline device architecture) with experimental data, we compare the impact of ferroelectric-dielectric (FE-DE) and ferroelectric-paraelectric-dielectric (FE-PE-DE) gate stacks on the electrostatics of an NCFET device for a practically realisable metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor (MFIS) structure. A suitable thickness of the ferroelectric (FE) layer in the FE-DE stack and the maximum drain-source voltage ( V d s ) that can be applied (determining the power supply voltage), are identified so as to ensure that constraints such as no negative differential resistance (NDR) effects, threshold voltage ( V t h ), sub-threshold slope (SS) invariability with drain voltage variations and hysteresis-free behavior in transfer characteristics ( I d - V g s ) are all satisfied. From the thickness of the FE layer in the FE-DE stack, the thickness of the FE layer in the FE-PE-DE stack (PE layer thickness is fixed at 1 nm) is determined where with a thicker FE layer, we obtain similar capacitance from the FE-PE-DE gate stack to that obtained from the FE-DE stack, while meeting all the constraints applied to the FE-DE stack based NCFET, enabling determination of the power supply voltage. Through showing good SSs with reduced output conductance ( g d s ), resulting in improved dc gain ( g m g d s ) and improved linearity parameters ( g m 2 and g m 3 ) along with scaling of power supply, an FE-PE-DE stack shows better analog performance, with lower power consumption, compared to an FE-DE stack, for an FDSOI NCFET, at 14 nm gate length.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137261766&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ac8a10; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6641/ac8a10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ac8a10; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=08e3d33d-edf4-4a29-b7bf-b57f032b7fb8&ssb=61028233512&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6641%2Fac8a10&ssi=c0a8f3f2-cnvj-4045-924b-23c6fab1c6c7&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=07665631587161569689083249640892687&ssn=d44ea79834ae81611df19cea2233360f6e911bcddbfa-b2e6-4a73-9f367d&sso=5ee1e11c-e6be62910580e7336f0a376321d5bb3d90806740a66d7e05&ssp=84679731451739336943173995985827007&ssq=90835203419326700925779322545522293933333&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwODczZGY4ZmMtMDBkZC00MzI3LThlZGYtZWU0N2FlMDJiNzBkOC0xNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0NTU0ODcwMzMxLWQ1NTY2ODZjMWE2Y2Q2NmU2ODkwNSIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDc3Nzk5YTEzLWQ5MWUtNDA4Ny1iMmJkLTk4NDhkOTE5NGE2MzE3MzkzNzkzMjI5MjQ1NTQ4NzAzMzEtNDM3M2QzYjliYzQ2N2NmMTY4OTA1IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know