Active flutter control of a bridge-flap system considering aerodynamic interferences in practical considerations
Smart Materials and Structures, ISSN: 1361-665X, Vol: 31, Issue: 6
2022
- 6Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Designing bridges with spans larger than 2000 m is challenging. One critical problem is that the flutter stability of such bridges is extremely weak. In past studies, actively controlled flaps were found to improve the flutter stability performance. However, in those studies, the deck was always assumed to be an ideal streamlined plate to simplify the aerodynamic interference effect in the deck-flap system. This simplification limits the application of this technique on real projects. To improve the applicability, we adopt a typical bluff body deck to investigate the effect of the active flaps under different wind attack angles. The novelty of this work is the analysis of the aerodynamic interference and resulting control impact considering the application scenario. The tests are conducted through the computational fluid dynamic method. To give intuitive explanations of the aerodynamic interference, the distributed aerodynamic characteristics method is innovatively introduced to quantify the contribution of flap on the flutter stability during the control process. Our results show that the leading flap has a dominant contribution to the flutter stability by inducing the beneficial aerodynamic damping on the deck's leading surfaces. Its optimal phase should be about π/2 lagging from the deck's torsional motion. In comparison, the effect of the trailing flap is unstable under different wind attack angles. To guarantee a robust control effect, it is suggested that it remains stationary.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130193041&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ac65c5; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-665X/ac65c5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ac65c5; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=2a089098-b3d3-4faf-98b0-704fe649df26&ssb=27046245191&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-665X%2Fac65c5&ssi=4c0a4c80-cnvj-477f-a773-3dc99437fcdc&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=96424852821110279576018644547448166&ssn=c796210643a63e90656baeda276de6f69b526e9c6c62-bdb9-4deb-82e717&sso=72cf7081-d7b4100be1c48d2c38936608526d842bd9949b1da85838f0&ssp=64630660631729752946173024571813445&ssq=02462984240647987233406969156405750452587&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwZjE4MDUxZmYtNjRmOS00MmIyLWI5NTAtOTA0ZDU2OWUyZWUyNy0xNzI5NzA2OTY5NTIzNTM1NDM3MjA1LWM1MGY0NzQyZjM0NTNiNjk1NzU4OSIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGU1YTcxYmRkLTQ2MTctNDVmNS05Mjk4LTI0ZWRjZjkwODdhMDE3Mjk3MDY5Njk1MjM1MzU0MzcyMDUtODE1ZTE0ZWYzNmMxOGM0ZTU3NTk1IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know