A halo mass - Concentration relation from weak lensing
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, ISSN: 1475-7516, Vol: 2008, Issue: 8
2008
- 180Citations
- 46Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We perform a statistical weak lensing analysis of dark matter profiles around tracers of halo mass from galaxy-size to cluster-size halos. In this analysis we use 170 640 isolated ∼L galaxies split into ellipticals and spirals, 38 236 groups traced via isolated spectroscopic luminous red galaxies and 13 823 maxBCG clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey covering a wide range of richness. Together these three samples allow a determination of the density profiles of dark matter halos over three orders of magnitude in mass, from to . The resulting lensing signal is consistent with a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) or Einasto profile on scales outside the central region. In the inner regions, uncertainty in modeling of the proper identification of the halo center and inclusion of baryonic effects from the central galaxy make the comparison less reliable. We find that the NFW concentration parameter c decreases with halo mass, from around 10 for galactic halos to 4 for cluster halos. Assuming its dependence on halo mass in the form of we find c = 4.6 0.7 (at z = 0.22) and β = 0.13 0.07, with very similar results for the Einasto profile. The slope (β) is in agreement with theoretical predictions, while the amplitude is about two standard deviations below the predictions for this mass and redshift, but we note that the published values in the literature differ at a level of 10-20% and that for a proper comparison our analysis should be repeated in simulations. We compare our results to other recent determinations, some of which find significantly higher concentrations. We discuss the implications of our results for the baryonic effects on the shear power spectrum: since these are expected to increase the halo concentration, the fact that we see no evidence of high concentrations on scales above 20% of the virial radius suggests that baryonic effects are limited to small scales, and are not a significant source of uncertainty for the current weak lensing measurements of the dark matter power spectrum. © 2008 IOP Publishing Ltd. and SISSA.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56349096840&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/006; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/006; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=6584e128-ffc8-4c89-818c-f7aab061bedf&ssb=76279211661&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2008%2F08%2F006&ssi=a616e85c-8427-4207-94c7-3378d9665302&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=4564563621508003394368324976696028&ssn=150cc9304c25f386e9902eed2775588fa98617c5ab98-6cb9-4002-9fbe64&sso=0e2b0673-5afc0bb05247aa88117f28bbde81d63f89ee536dfd61584c&ssp=84542961621718096897171815176910690&ssq=17338749992804708854599480389115837543437&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMDM5MTI3NDctNTcxYy00YTExLWI1M2UtNGFjZjQ3MDljNmNiMi0xNzE4MDk5NDgwNzkxMTAwNDQ3OTM2LTg2NGNiMzM3NGM5ZmJjNzA5NDM2IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwMGQzMzFjOGEtYjgzNy00ODMxLWI4YzctNTBlZjhhNmEwMjIzMTcxODA5OTQ4MDc5MTEwMDQ0NzkzNi01NDIwYzhiNWQ5Yjk1NjAwOTQzNiJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know