Possible role of magnetic reconnection in the electromagnetic counterpart of binary black hole merger
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, ISSN: 1475-7516, Vol: 2018, Issue: 4, Page: 054-054
2018
- 16Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We propose a qualitative scenario to interpret the argued association between the direct measurement of the gravitational wave event GW150914 by Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO)-Virgo collaborations and the hard X-ray transient detected by Fermi-Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 sec after. In a binary system of two gravitationally collapsing objects with a non-vanishing electric charge, the compenetration of the two magnetospheres occurring during the coalescence, through magnetic reconnection, produces a highly collimated relativistic outflow that becomes optically thin and shines in the GBM field of view. We propose that this process should be expected as a commonplace in the future joint gravitational/electromagnetic detections and, in case of neutron star-neutron star merger event, might lead to detectable X- or γ-ray precursors to, or transients associated with, the gravitational bursts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046842448&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/054; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/054; http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2018/i=04/a=054/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2018/i=04/a=054?key=crossref.83bd6e30c434ab73589601a5dbc244da; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/054; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=b0adf4b9-fba1-4515-98f1-52a8b2d455ab&ssb=10996247208&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2018%2F04%2F054&ssi=1ece147d-cnvj-46c3-968d-86933b992edb&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=290258397920630297892950156543634461&ssn=de41aa34542db9791ae205f214329cc3ac030900c3c4-8990-4f21-a15f7a&sso=a51dff8c-bc564dd29deaa85a7bee35006593248791f399a3d83c64eb&ssp=46555631561726521750172706422854414&ssq=57083229034957764823529239074927189238126&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTYxMTEwMzc1LWE5YjA2YTIwNDY5NGViZDA3ODkxMjEiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlOC0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTYxMTEwMzc1LWFmZDM0YTc4MzIxNGY2NTU3ODkwMzQifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know