Cosmological constraints with self-interacting sterile neutrinos
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, ISSN: 1475-7516, Vol: 2018, Issue: 10, Page: 055-055
2018
- 39Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this work we revisit the question of whether Cosmology can be made compatible with scenarios with light sterile neutrinos, as invoked to explain the SBL anomalies, in the presence of self-interaction among sterile neutrinos mediated by massive gauge bosons. We examine this proposal by deriving the cosmological predictions of the model in a wide range of the model parameters including the effective interaction strength G, sterile neutrino mass m and active-sterile mixings. With those we perform a statistical analysis of the cosmological data from BBN, CMB, and BAO data to infer the posterior probabilities of the sterile self-interaction model parameters. BBN mostly provides information about the effective interaction strength and we find that log≥ 4.0 can describe the primordial abundances at 95% CL. Our analysis of CMB and BAO data show that when allowing a wide prior for the sterile neutrino mass its posterior is bounded to m≤ 0.95eV (95% CL) considering CMB data only and m≤ 0.37eV (95% CL) when adding the BAO information. So the mass bounds are slightly relaxed compared with that of a non-interacting sterile neutrino model but a sterile neutrino mass of 1 eV is still excluded at more than 2σ CL. Conversely if fixing the sterile neutrino mass and mixing to the values prefered by short baseline data we find that while that CMB data alone favors the self-interacting scenario, including the BAO information severely degrades the agreement with the model. Altogether we conclude then that adding the self-interaction can alleviate the tension between eV sterile neutrinos and CMB data, but when including also the BAO results the self-interacting sterile neutrino model cannot lead to a satisfactory description of the data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056140870&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/055; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/055; http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2018/i=10/a=055/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2018/i=10/a=055?key=crossref.c7720fc8c8ae13e46c06c28b9db7af0d; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/055; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=56bc2947-fcc8-4579-9191-20ed87ade0b5&ssb=87002242960&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2018%2F10%2F055&ssi=3699f626-cnvj-4a1b-9cc4-a5c58b49f434&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=724177752319992606888253028559687232&ssn=3a00235bc39b22d9f23a2a9dec313b37d6f10900c3c4-8990-4f21-a645fe&sso=e099af8c-bc564dd29dea032480fe2d8dea78058090ccd7f4842a2fc8&ssp=99967747741726567701172706770074371&ssq=43573721228529514195929239277152403967093&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNDgzMDQ2NTM2LTAzZDM3YjE3ZTZlZmYyZGM2ODg2NjYiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlNy0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNDgzMDQ2NTM2LWI0MjlkODQzMjBmMTQ5NDA2ODg1OTEiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know