Towards a precision calculation of the effective number of neutrinos Nin the standard model. Part II. neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, ISSN: 1475-7516, Vol: 2021, Issue: 4
2021
- 164Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We present in this work a new calculation of the standard-model benchmark value for the effective number of neutrinos, NSMeff, that quantifies the cosmological neutrinoto- photon energy densities. The calculation takes into account neutrino flavour oscillations, finite-temperature effects in the quantum electrodynamics plasma to O(e3), where e is the elementary electric charge, and a full evaluation of the neutrino-neutrino collision integral. We provide furthermore a detailed assessment of the uncertainties in the benchmark NSMeff value, through testing the value's dependence on (i) optional approximate modelling of the weak collision integrals, (ii) measurement errors in the physical parameters of the weak sector, and (iii) numerical convergence, particularly in relation to momentum discretisation. Our new, recommended standard-model benchmark is NSMeff 3.0440 ± 0.0002, where the nominal uncertainty is attributed predominantly to errors incurred in the numerical solution procedure (|δNeff| ~ 10-4), augmented by measurement errors in the solar mixing angle sin2 θ12 (|δNeff| ~ 10-4).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106387955&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/073; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/073; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/073; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=3e5b779b-74ff-44d9-a7b0-a73b61e573fa&ssb=71856231711&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2021%2F04%2F073&ssi=1b2fc14e-8427-4e3f-8009-7f2b37e47c65&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=06949372412275388728712535466936302&ssn=d2e96cff719d504dd789a483d40d03e2dbac17c5ab98-6cb9-4002-9fb841&sso=632ed673-5afc0bb05247f57264fb4f285f8d5ea635afbf81cdc13c17&ssp=35826565671718032062171871833769824&ssq=78033900236436506726899480706425668326984&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMDM5MTI3NDctNTcxYy00YTExLWI1M2UtNGFjZjQ3MDljNmNiOC0xNzE4MDk5NDgwNzkxNjAyODgzOTU3LWRjNzFmOWZmNTAwNWEyM2U3Mjg2MiIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDBkMzMxYzhhLWI4MzctNDgzMS1iOGM3LTUwZWY4YTZhMDIyMzE3MTgwOTk0ODA3OTE2MDI4ODM5NTctZTQxNGNkZWU5NzQyOWEyNjcyODYyIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know