Constraints from high-precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background: The case of disintegrating dark matter with Λ or dynamical dark energy
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, ISSN: 1475-7516, Vol: 2022, Issue: 2
2022
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In recent years discrepancies have emerged in measurements of the present-day rate of expansion of the universe H 0 and in estimates of the clustering of matter S 8. Using the most recent cosmological observations we reexamine a novel model proposed to address these tensions, in which cold dark matter disintegrates into dark radiation. The disintegration process is controlled by its rate Q = α ., ρddm, where α is a (constant) dimensionless parameter quantifying the strength of the disintegration mechanism and ., is the conformal Hubble rate in the spatially flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker universe and ρddm is the energy density of the disintegrating cold dark matter. We constrain this model with the latest 2018 Planck temperature and polarization data, showing that there is no evidence for α≠ 0 and that it cannot solve the H 0 tension below 3σ, clashing with the result obtained by analyzing the Planck 2015 temperature data. We also investigate two possible extensions of the model in which the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w ≠ -1. In this case it is possible to combine Planck data with the SH0ES measurement, and we demonstrate that in both these models the H 0 tension is resolved at the 1σ level, but the condition w ≠ -1 exacerbates the S 8 tension. We also demonstrate that the addition of intermediate-redshift data (from the Pantheon supernova type Ia dataset and baryon acoustic oscillations) weakens the effectiveness of all these models to address the H 0 and S 8 tensions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125733986&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/012; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/012; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=432625c4-db70-4ae2-a867-8e69579fe6a2&ssb=99926212662&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2022%2F02%2F012&ssi=e8252044-cnvj-4717-b009-05ef9e9f7fd9&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=63416498461881702250607284252424222&ssn=9be45f50ccac2bfeb2460668f20cdc52be8a6db1c10c-a37a-41b2-b9b17f&sso=88876205-c45fe023bb4995fc3d2bd523e67ec2d73fdbe5c9974ed93b&ssp=58191180661723794889172442156796070&ssq=83455573645260469408131741224532438093084&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA1NjQyMDdlYy1iZmUwLTQzM2UtYjQ1OC1hYjM1MTQ0YzcxMDcxNzIzNzMxNzQxMjU1NzA0NzExMjEwLWZkYTkyOGMxMGUzZmRlODgyNTA2MCIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDBhMjUzOGQ5ZS1lNDA0LTQ0NTItODE2NC1jNGY3MWM0YTg5NGY5LTE3MjM3MzE3NDEyNTU3MDQ3MTEyMTAtNGVhMTU2YTlkOTNjOWQ4MzI1MDYwIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know