Concurrence evolution of two qubits coupled with one-mode cavity separately
Chinese Physics B, ISSN: 1674-1056, Vol: 19, Issue: 9, Page: 094204-1-094204-6
2010
- 3Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
The concurrence evolution of two qubits coupled with one-mode cavity separately is investigated exactly without adopting the rotating-wave approximation. The results show that for the resonant case, the concurrence evolution behaviour of the system is similar to that of the Markovian case when the coupling strength is weak, while the concurrence vanishes in a finite time and might revive fractional initial entanglement before it permanently vanishes when the coupling strength is strong. And for the detuning case, the entanglement could periodically recover after complete disentanglement. These results are quite different from those of system subjected to Jaynes-Cummings model. © 2010 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649342381&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/19/9/094204; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1056/19/9/094204; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=3981391&internal_id=3981391&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/19/9/094204; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=3a93e93f-7122-419f-881d-529e6e8b8983&ssb=65101277167&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1674-1056%2F19%2F9%2F094204&ssi=742595f7-8427-4f22-b675-b0b4292b7e23&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=66228480860213781782355809062668146&ssn=c5cb9d966f23f2507854d6058f919778385487516380-2ef0-41fb-a581bd&sso=3633c582-9ca0d8699968351ea07fc8e68c36ade877f9a327cff80500&ssp=99430235551721420564172156885139941&ssq=73327901164711913434728364099606633665989&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwODIxNGUxOWMtOWM1ZS00Y2U1LTljYjktYmZhM2JjZGZlMDAxMi0xNzIxNDI4MzY0MzY4ODMyODMxMTctMmEzYzQ0M2UwYmNkODg2Yzc4MjI2IiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwMDIwYWFhMGEtNDU0OC00NzdlLWI4ZmUtNWI2MTYxNTA5YzYyMTcyMTQyODM2NDM2ODgzMjgzMTE3LTY2OWI4ODRmMmI4ZmIzZTQ3ODIyNiIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know