Regularization dependence of pion generalized parton distributions
Chinese Physics C, ISSN: 1674-1137, Vol: 46, Issue: 6
2022
- 3Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Pion generalized parton distributions are calculated within the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model using different regularization schemes, including the proper time regularization scheme, the three-dimensional (3D) momentum cutoff scheme, the four-dimensional momentum cutoff scheme, and the Pauli-Villars regularization scheme. Furthermore, we check the theoretical constraints of pion generalized parton distributions required by the symmetries of quantum chromodynamics in different regularization schemes. The diagrams of pion parton distribution functions are plotted, in addition, we evaluate the Mellin moments of generalized parton distributions, which are related to the electromagnetic and gravitational form factors of pion. Pion generalized parton distributions are continuous but not differential at, when considering the effect of the contact contribution term, generalized parton distributions become not continuous at in all the four regularization schemes. Generalized parton distributions in impact parameter space are considered, the width distribution of u quark in the pion and the mean-squared are calculated. The light-front transverse-spin distributions are studied when quark polarized in the light-front-transverse direction, the transverse-spin density is no longer symmetric around, the peaks shift to, we compare the average transverse shift and in different regularization schemes. The light-cone energy radius and the light-cone charge radius are also evaluated, we found that in the proper time regularization scheme the values of these quantities were the largest, in the 3D momentum cutoff scheme they were the smallest.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131672877&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac57b6; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/ac57b6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac57b6; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=f59211ee-8b9e-424e-81f2-b9ec1f626d57&ssb=53458252478&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1674-1137%2Fac57b6&ssi=322195be-cnvj-49bc-af17-99595a1ab324&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=21227244806973761677267848287530507&ssn=5a5dbf1cc833a2ae15ac8913e5e7056756431f051b2d-009f-4552-862565&sso=fa127fee-8795a6526857f441f5e2712d76dd329f254a5c9551e8b82b&ssp=50745214101733918197173413097511056&ssq=21671055069921733726538547284897133068616&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjRkYjliNjAtM2U0MS00YTA5LTg0MmQtMDEzOTlhYWJkOTI5NC0xNzMzOTM4NTQ3NjEzMjEyMTUxOTM2LWQzMTE0MjcyOTU4YzcwMGI2NzcyNiIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGMwMzU4NmNkLTYwNmQtNDg2Yy1hZDE0LTMxNDc2M2JiOGI5ODE3MzM5Mzg1NDc2MTMyMTIxNTE5MzUtNmFmMTdiMzI4NTAwOWU1MjY3NzI2IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7216535&internal_id=7216535&from=elsevier
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know