The Electromagnetic Characteristics of the Tianlai Cylindrical Pathfinder Array
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, ISSN: 1674-4527, Vol: 22, Issue: 6
2022
- 11Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
Article Description
A great challenge for 21 cm intensity mapping experiments is the strong foreground radiation which is orders of magnitude brighter than the 21 cm signal. Removal of the foreground takes advantage of the fact that its frequency spectrum is smooth while the redshifted 21 cm signal spectrum is stochastic. However, a complication is the non-smoothness of the instrument response. This paper describes the electromagnetic simulation of the Tianlai cylinder array, a pathfinder for 21 cm intensity mapping experiments. Due to the vast scales involved, a direct simulation requires a large amount of computing resources. We have made the simulation practical by using a combination of methods: first simulate a single feed, then an array of feed units, finally with the feed array and a cylindrical reflector together, obtain the response for a single cylinder. We studied its radiation pattern, bandpass response and the effects of mutual coupling between feed units, and compared the results with observation. Many features seen in the measurement result are reproduced well in the simulation, especially the oscillatory features which are associated with the standing waves on the reflector. The mutual coupling between feed units is quantified with S-parameters, which decrease as the distance between the two feeds increases. Based on the simulated S-parameters, we estimate the correlated noise which has been seen in the visibility data, and the results show very good agreement with the data in both magnitude and frequency structures. These results provide useful insights on the problem of 21 cm signal extraction for real instruments.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132743854&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac684d; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-4527/ac684d; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac684d; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=d1d44216-8d81-4d84-ae24-91593b034d20&ssb=14761204399&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1674-4527%2Fac684d&ssi=bfaaa426-cnvj-48ab-9d20-a19ac1621909&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=35518611708682537694755998180931950&ssn=2f1fbc062e61ad29e5ddebf6a43709e1b1fc1f051b2d-009f-4552-890011&sso=c60c1fee-8795a6526857a2645a7305aacc5815c7fe3e6d6b7fd041e5&ssp=06690762291733951544173414635334491&ssq=41049745345765383718038547063156859589278&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjRkYjliNjAtM2U0MS00YTA5LTg0MmQtMDEzOTlhYWJkOTI5NC0xNzMzOTM4NTQ3NjEzMjE0OTA5ODU1LThmYTNmYjI2YWE1MTU4ZGI2OTQ3NSIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGMwMzU4NmNkLTYwNmQtNDg2Yy1hZDE0LTMxNDc2M2JiOGI5ODE3MzM5Mzg1NDc2MTMyMTQ5MDk4NTUtZjQ2ZWIyNzBjNjY1NWRiZDY5NDc1In0=; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7238988&internal_id=7238988&from=elsevier
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know