Clarifying the atomic origin of electron killers in β-GaO from the first-principles study of electron capture rates
Journal of Semiconductors, ISSN: 1674-4926, Vol: 43, Issue: 11
2022
- 5Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The emerging wide bandgap semiconductor -GaO has attracted great interest due to its promising applications for high-power electronic devices and solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors. Deep-level defects in -GaO have been intensively studied towards improving device performance. Deep-level signatures E , E , and E with energy positions of 0.55-0.63, 0.74-0.81, and 1.01-1.10 eV below the conduction band minimum have frequently been observed and extensively investigated, but their atomic origins are still under debate. In this work, we attempt to clarify these deep-level signatures from the comparison of theoretically predicted electron capture cross-sections of suggested candidates, Ti and Fe substituting Ga on a tetrahedral site (Ti and Fe) and an octahedral site (Ti and Fe), to experimentally measured results. The first-principles approach predicted electron capture cross-sections of Ti and Ti defects are 8.56 × 10 and 2.97 × 10 cm, in good agreement with the experimental values of E and E centers, respectively. We, therefore, confirmed that E and E centers are indeed associated with Ti and Tidefects, respectively. Whereas the predicted electron capture cross-sections of Fe defect are two orders of magnitude larger than the experimental value of the E , indicating E may have other origins like Cand Ga, rather than common believed Fe
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142533568&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/43/11/112801; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-4926/43/11/112801; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/43/11/112801; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=0effc310-e6ab-4e19-ae2a-bb04c2a6192b&ssb=09208268586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1674-4926%2F43%2F11%2F112801&ssi=d306d87b-cnvj-4074-ab14-a54d839a00ae&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=420059807975833443587853183052780&ssn=cb9291348a608afba4c5cd0c1ffddc1c00340a9b0a9a-3aac-4f6c-85df4b&sso=75936a33-50a162a46e1e5438975e0ea84d6cae3e6195d882f8ec7fa2&ssp=86440493541723335219172332479064374&ssq=25794103111186992906319866790217640173321&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBhZjdjNzQ4OC02ZWEyLTQ3YTAtOWQxNy01NDY2YzRjOThiMTQxNzIzMzE5ODY2OTU2MTEyNDQ2MTMtMGNmZmZkNWFmNjgzMTFkYTM1OCIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA2MjNiMzNjYi1jYWFmLTRlOGUtODE4ZS05NzRjYzc0Njg3MjIxLTE3MjMzMTk4NjY5NTYxMTI0NDYxMy01M2EyZjJkYjU3ZTExZTY5MzU4In0=; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7342826&internal_id=7342826&from=elsevier
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know