Error field detection and correction studies towards ITER operation
Nuclear Fusion, ISSN: 1741-4326, Vol: 64, Issue: 6
2024
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In magnetic fusion devices, error field (EF) sources, spurious magnetic field perturbations, need to be identified and corrected for safe and stable (disruption-free) tokamak operation. Within Work Package Tokamak Exploitation RT04, a series of studies have been carried out to test the portability of the novel non-disruptive method, designed and tested in DIII-D (Paz-Soldan et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 126007), and to perform an assessment of model-based EF control strategies towards their applicability in ITER. In this paper, the lessons learned, the physical mechanism behind the magnetic island healing, which relies on enhanced viscous torque that acts against the static electro-magnetic torque, and the main control achievements are reported, together with the first design of the asynchronous EF correction current/density controller for ITER.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192951695&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3fcd; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3fcd; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3fcd; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=25c7d364-16c5-4e10-8f80-e24e5afdd30b&ssb=76014265359&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1741-4326%2Fad3fcd&ssi=69ebcd6b-cnvj-4e8c-b534-f2ceacfa8bb6&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=12262603650880988777375462339044869&ssn=ddbbfecf560e9a61d1ef37cba9186956f8d91bcddbfa-b2e6-4a73-965b22&sso=10dde11c-e6be629105800a43baa03b0ca0b0d563c35be9b3484dfe98&ssp=81772505311739354477173998851732239&ssq=11850378575519560664079322941273037478469&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3Nzc5OWExMy1kOTFlLTQwODctYjJiZC05ODQ4ZDkxOTRhNjMxNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0NjA2NDMyNjY0LWNjNjM5NWE0OTc5YzZlZjQ3NzczNCIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA4NzNkZjhmYy0wMGRkLTQzMjctOGVkZi1lZTQ3YWUwMmI3MGQ4LTE3MzkzNzkzMjI5MjQ2MDY0MzI2NjQtOThkM2RlNmQ4MDliOWNmOTc3NzM0In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know