Monitoring algorithm of stress point of concrete penstock in large construction engineering
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, ISSN: 1742-6596, Vol: 2066, Issue: 1
2021
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
With the rapid development of the national construction industry, cracks and other problems often appear in the concrete structure during the initial and subsequent construction. When these problems develop further, the structural safety of the entire building may be compromised. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the causes of cracks and other problems in concrete buildings, and be able to monitor and analyze these problems in time, and then propose reasonable solutions. This is already a problem that the entire construction technicians urgently need to solve. This paper studies the algorithm for monitoring stress points of concrete penstocks in large construction projects. Firstly, it uses literature research to explain the form of stress nodes in large-scale construction projects and the deficiencies in the research on the stress nodes of concrete penstocks in large-scale construction projects. In the experiment, the existing 3 algorithms are used to detect the force points, and compare their detection degree and false alarm rate. The experimental results show that the detection effect of the KNN algorithm is obviously inferior to the other two algorithms with the same neighbor parameters. Its detection rate is only 91%, and the false alarm rate reaches 30%. The other two algorithms are equivalent. The detection effect of the KNN algorithm is obviously inferior to the other two algorithms, the detection rate is poor, the outlier force points that are obviously deviating from the whole around the dense force points are not recognized, and the data of many normal force points located at the edge of the sparse area Instead, it was recognized as abnormal. Among the three algorithms, the detection rate of the NLOF algorithm is better, reaching 99%, which is significantly higher than the other two algorithms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119398739&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2066/1/012027; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2066/1/012027; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2066/1/012027/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2066/1/012027; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=8b58961b-b0e3-4678-abc0-ebaa9f7a0706&ssb=45649203592&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1742-6596%2F2066%2F1%2F012027&ssi=97bcbc05-cnvj-418f-9c07-4f06bf12f202&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=25917820411666219259969597073471576&ssn=dedc71505eaaed234acdb46389ebe76670aa3b06693a-ab42-47cc-876185&sso=ba12fa70-560bf8d25e53bfb78556b950a5f7be4b28488ec0ddd8a725&ssp=67114191771735648717173611569395980&ssq=10348290670655919959397305792080335598384&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjOGQ4M2E0NC01NzY0LTQzMGYtYmU4ZC03ZmU3OTdkYjBhMzMxNzM1Njk3MzA1NTMyNDA5NDAxNDYzLTBjMTVkNDU3ZDFhN2JlZjIyNTk5NiIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDBhM2RlMjYzYS1kM2RjLTQ0MzMtOTg3My02ZmZhOTQ2OTAwOGE1LTE3MzU2OTczMDU1MzI0MDk0MDE0NjMtM2YwYWMwOTgxYTIwOWM3NzI1OTk2In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know