Neoclassical modeling of the radial electric field and comparison with measurements in the TJ-II stellarator
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, ISSN: 1742-6596, Vol: 591, Issue: 1
2015
- 5Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The results of the radial electric field measurements by Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP) in the TJ-II stellarator are compared with neoclassical transport computations. The role played by several plasma features is identified by studying a reduced analytical transport model, using both actual density and temperature profiles and representative model profiles for varying density. Additional electric field calculations are carried out numerically with the Astra code using three different expressions for the neoclassical transport coefficients in order to identify the common features characterizing E, particularly the sign reversal. For regimes with a wide variation of collisionality, a general qualitative agreement between modeling and experimental data is shown. The obtention of roots for E depends critically upon the temperature and density profiles as they determine the plasma collisional regime. It is found that the root transition (i.e. E sign reversal) occurs for a specific range of a collisionality parameter, consistent for all models employed. It is found that when density and temperature profiles give real roots of the electric field the pressure is almost constant. Discharges with high radial gradient of E are found to correlate well with high confinement regimes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84938153673&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/591/1/012011; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/591/1/012011; http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/591/i=1/a=012011/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/591/i=1/a=012011?key=crossref.52972f81ca0358a75a126ced50cb63a0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/591/1/012011; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=6fe987fd-ff17-4536-894e-47c4bb20f231&ssb=06959205416&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1742-6596%2F591%2F1%2F012011&ssi=af59c024-8427-414b-b429-2df36adee743&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=30641858868574040279612231294059767&ssn=04d096d3c49c485a47b67f39b6e5c0fe38c42f0fbc69-9e01-4767-92eda9&sso=f5b05809-259ac1c821e14cbc54d0126134ac8bdbc09aa8b58f94f8ff&ssp=88218497191721213181172135001252184&ssq=14107950537495043521936784181191975138539&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwYzRhOTI4MWEtNWZjMS00ZGYzLWI4NzYtYjk2N2Q4OTViOTI1Mi0xNzIxMjM2Nzg0NTAyNjg1ODk4MjItYzAxODMxYTk5MDNlYmYyZDI3OTYxIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwZDk2NmIwZDQtYjQ3Ny00MzJmLWJlNDMtMWUwNDYxMDE4MTc4MTcyMTIzNjc4NDUwMjY4NTg5ODIyLTgwNTIxMWVjNzQ2ZDk1OTAyNzk2MSJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know