Trapping in proton irradiated p-n-n silicon sensors at fluences anticipated at the HL-LHC outer tracker
Journal of Instrumentation, ISSN: 1748-0221, Vol: 11, Issue: 4, Page: P04023-P04023
2016
- 6Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef6
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
The degradation of signal in silicon sensors is studied under conditions expected at the CERN High-Luminosity LHC. 200μm thick n-type silicon sensors are irradiated with protons of different energies to fluences of up to 3 · 10 neq/cm. Pulsed red laser light with a wavelength of 672 nm is used to generate electron-hole pairs in the sensors. The induced signals are used to determine the charge collection efficiencies separately for electrons and holes drifting through the sensor. The effective trapping rates are extracted by comparing the results to simulation. The electric field is simulated using Synopsys device simulation assuming two effective defects. The generation and drift of charge carriers are simulated in an independent simulation based on PixelAV. The effective trapping rates are determined from the measured charge collection efficiencies and the simulated and measured time-resolved current pulses are compared. The effective trapping rates determined for both electrons and holes are about 50% smaller than those obtained using standard extrapolations of studies at low fluences and suggest an improved tracker performance over initial expectations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85023209584&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/p04023; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/P04023; http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/11/i=04/a=P04023/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/11/i=04/a=P04023?key=crossref.a84b4e1ad6d9c76c527fadd6d0a2b02d; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/p04023; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=0b6f8e9e-37ba-4401-b240-72c65601733c&ssb=73840271509&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-0221%2F11%2F04%2FP04023&ssi=d6e51c56-8427-4eef-91d5-55c6482bc2f2&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=309917618303471791487622531948412185&ssn=48a0cbc88ea6641b20dc074fa9a09fc48a1a17f9ea44-4e1f-4e35-b09682&sso=22cff15e-f9d9f87a371f88b62ce3df09f45b0933b051bb5ad603379b&ssp=31618155801719398246171985338612392&ssq=59473293884137714086805699587854233289480&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjMGI2MzM1NC00OGRkLTRjNTUtODVmZS00NzZmMjgxYzE5ZDgxNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1NTMzMTQyMzkyLTcwOGU4ZjYyOGYxYTg0ZjgxNDg3NTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMWUxYTVkMGQtYjRlNi00ZTQ0LWFmYTgtNzUxMTFmZjg0ZDlmNy0xNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1NTMzMTQyMzkyLTBlMzA3ZmZkNjE5Mjk1OTYxNDg3NDcifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know