Conceptual design of reciprocating probes and material-testing manipulator for tokamak COMPASS Upgrade
Journal of Instrumentation, ISSN: 1748-0221, Vol: 17, Issue: 2
2022
- 5Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Three new in-vessel manipulators are designed and built for the new COMPASS Upgrade tokamak with uniquely high vessel temperature (250-500 °C) and heat flux density (perpendicular to divertor surface q ⊥ ∼80 MW/m2 and q ∼GW/m2 at separatrix), which challenges the edge plasma diagnostics. Here we show their detailed engineering designs supported by heat conduction and mechanical models. Deep reciprocation of electrostatic probes near the separatrix should be possible by optimizing older concepts in (a) the head and probe geometry, (b) strongly increasing the deceleration up to 100× gravity by springs and strengthening the manipulator mechanical structure. One reciprocates close to the region of edge plasma influx (the outer midplane), the other at the plasma sink (between the outer divertor strike point and X-point), for studying the plasma divertor (impurity-seeded) detachment and liquid metal vapor transport. Both probe heads are equipped with a set of ball-pen and Langmuir probes, measuring reliably and extremely fast (10-6 s) local (1 mm resolution) plasma potential, density, electron temperature and heat flux and even ion temperature with 10-5 s resolution. The divertor manipulator (without reciprocation) will place various material test targets at the outer divertor. Unique will be its capability to increase 15× the surface heat flux with respect to the surrounding tungsten tiles just by controllable surface inclination of the test targets. We plan to test liquid metal targets where such inclined surface was found critical to achieve the desired mode with lithium vapor shielding. Even in the conservative expected performance of COMPASS Upgrade, we predict to reach and survive the EU DEMO relevant heat fluxes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125640769&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/02/c02007; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/17/02/C02007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/02/c02007; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=98894c58-34e6-49c8-b08e-fcdac5a6072f&ssb=32040285874&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-0221%2F17%2F02%2FC02007&ssi=50c1cd93-cnvj-4d45-9a4a-3786a89d1170&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=00567551661183599222854546178967532&ssn=31fd8883d16e35150934ec2750375430e1296db1c10c-a37a-41b2-bde120&sso=06318205-c45fe023bb4902ee53b8a26b1ad36a3ca03a677a46d2abdb&ssp=17089615031723753610172425342925453&ssq=28850349666597359525731741351785298422846&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwYTI1MzhkOWUtZTQwNC00NDUyLTgxNjQtYzRmNzFjNGE4OTRmOC0xNzIzNzMxNzQxMjU1NTY0OTI0NzI0LTQ2NmQzZjFlZjU5ZWZlNWUyMjI4NSIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDU2NDIwN2VjLWJmZTAtNDMzZS1iNDU4LWFiMzUxNDRjNzEwNzE3MjM3MzE3NDEyNTU1NjQ5MjQ3MjQtYzkzNTEyMzU0NmQ4ZTZhNTIyMjg1IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know