Climatic modulation of recent trends in ocean acidification in the California Current System
Environmental Research Letters, ISSN: 1748-9326, Vol: 11, Issue: 1
2016
- 59Citations
- 119Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We reconstruct the evolution of ocean acidification in the California Current System (CalCS) from 1979 through 2012 using hindcast simulations with an eddy-resolving ocean biogeochemical model forced with observation-based variations of wind and fluxes of heat and fresh water. We find that domain-wide pH and ω in the top 60mof the water column decreased significantly over these three decades by about-0.02 decade and-0.12 decade, respectively. In the near shore areas of northern California and Oregon, ocean acidification is reconstructed to have progressed much more rapidly, with rates up to 30% higher than the domain-wide trends. Furthermore, ocean acidification penetrated substantially into the thermocline, causing a significant domain-wide shoaling of the aragonite saturation depth of on average -33mdecade and up to-50mdecade in the near shore area of northern California. This resulted in a coast-wide increase in nearly undersaturated waters and the appearance of waters with ω < 1, leading to a substantial reduction of habitat suitability. Averaged over the whole domain, the main driver of these trends is the oceanic uptake of Anthropogenic CO from the atmosphere. However, recent changes in the climatic forcing have substantially modulated these trends regionally. This is particularly evident in the nearshore regions, where the total trends in pH are up to 50%larger and trends in ω and in the aragonite saturation depth are even twice to three times larger than the purely at mosphericCO-driven trends. This modulation in the near shore regions is a result of the recent marked increase in alongshore wind stress, which brought elevated levels of dissolved inorganic carbon to the surface via upwelling. Our results demonstrate that changes in the climatic forcing need to be taken into consideration in future projections of the progression of ocean acidification in coastal upwelling regions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84956649757&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014007; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014007; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014007/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014007; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=ea3ed312-86bc-416a-aa9e-7890b088a730&ssb=28790223164&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-9326%2F11%2F1%2F014007&ssi=9d7fd842-cnvj-41f2-9e4e-92064d4bdf46&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=25753990589699267112363702134182294&ssn=57528839ce09742245ebb2fae92d7e958b6ac5b291d5-3251-43ce-aafa45&sso=290b767a-59b08996083c1e401c0c4e9668d8fc63d65f35f1c0411fe0&ssp=41173319671728421679172861421297582&ssq=02667937316696671281394961765864755148903&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA2Nzk5YTg1MC1iMDA5LTQyNDctOWFjOC03MWNmMTFmYjY2MTgxNzI4NDk0OTYxMTM1MTc4MjA1MzkzLTNhMGJlODY0ZjExMTJiYmUxMTIzNiIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAxY2MwNjEwNC0zZDNjLTRhNGYtOTE4Ni1mNWI4MjZiN2M0MjkzLTE3Mjg0OTQ5NjExMzUxNzgyMDUzOTMtOWVmYTAwZGQ4ZDRmZGNmMTExMjM2IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know