Benchmark estimates for aboveground litterfall data derived from ecosystem models
Environmental Research Letters, ISSN: 1748-9326, Vol: 14, Issue: 8
2019
- 25Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Litter production is a fundamental ecosystem process, which plays an important role in regulating terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles. However, there are substantial differences in the litter production simulations among ecosystem models, and a global benchmarking evaluation to measure the performance of these models is still lacking. In this study, we generated a global dataset of aboveground litterfall production (i.e. cLitter), a benchmark as the defined reference to test model performance, by combining systematic measurements taken from a substantial number of surveys (1079 sites) with a machine learning technique (i.e. random forest, RF). Our study demonstrated that the RF model is an effective tool for upscaling local litterfall production observations to the global scale. On average, the model predicted 23.15 Pg C yr of aboveground litterfall production. Our results revealed substantial differences in the aboveground litterfall production simulations among the five investigated ecosystem models. Compared to the reference data at the global scale, most of models could reproduce the spatial patterns of aboveground litterfall production, but the magnitude of simulations differed substantially from the reference data. Overall, ORCHIDEE-MICT performed the best among the five investigated ecosystem models.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072695501&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2ee4; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2ee4; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2ee4/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2ee4; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=69798176-1efb-4e04-af2d-de042d8917dc&ssb=05144292325&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-9326%2Fab2ee4&ssi=acef858b-cnvj-4f11-a33e-9bd83bc17a51&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=34974035367804939759317127241125120&ssn=055187267967b9eb836251be57420f1620e39257b256-2e92-4da1-a698a4&sso=c57d1013-e6f1be2ceeb80acf05ecd119ba1bc77d305d0199bf04b9e5&ssp=36448771241731278871173189855230610&ssq=99369633519328061674175300231849682364382&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwOWM3MzVmYWUtMDU4Yi00MTQ5LWExM2ItZDMxNjY4ZTM0ZGFlOC0xNzMxMjc1MzAwNDc1NTU5ODkyNzc5LTJiNzRkNjAwODc2YWIwMWQ3NTkyOCIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDhjOWYwZTc0LTRiZjMtNGJlYy1iNGI4LTdkMjkwYmI4M2RlNTE3MzEyNzUzMDA0NzU1NTk4OTI3NzktMzc5NjI0MmYyZjQ2MzNmMjc1OTI4IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know