Categorization of precipitation changes in China under 1.5°C and 3°C global warming using the bivariate joint distribution from a multi-model perspective
Environmental Research Letters, ISSN: 1748-9326, Vol: 15, Issue: 12
2019
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Skeptical Science New Research for Week #50, 2020
"Wait - we don't need a bigger computer?" Readers following the Advances in climate & climate effects modeling... portion of the weekly research roundup may have noticed: in general, higher model resolution calculating climate behaviors at finer scales is helpful for increasing model fidelity against real-world observations. Coincident to this is another matter: It may be unfair as a purely scient
Article Description
This study examines the changes in the intensity and frequency of precipitation in China from a multi-model perspective on 20 statistically downscaled fine-scale climate projections and categorizes them into four distinct patterns in response to globally targeted warming (1.5°C and 3°C). In a multivariate setting, the asymmetric responses of frequency and intensity to different levels of warming can be considered jointly. This study focuses on relatively moderate precipitation to determine if the ensemble of a subset of climate models, which are selected based on the categorization, can provide a better interpretation of the changing patterns compared to that from the conventional unweighted ensemble mean. The results show that the spatial distribution of the predominant category and inter-model agreement are dependent mainly on the degree of warming. As warming becomes more extensive, the projected change in precipitation tends to converge to the category that indicates an increase in both the intensity and frequency of precipitation, from the mixed-mode and even decreasing pattern. The use of subsampling to produce an ensemble of joint probability (or return period) has potential benefits in detecting asymmetric changes in the intensity and frequency of precipitation that is seen in the majority of models but hidden by the unweighted ensemble average particularly for regions where different models show mixed signals. A substantial portion of the region in China is likely to experience a transition of changes in precipitation frequency and (or) intensity under continuous warming, which would not be revealed clearly by univariate analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098599612&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc8bb; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abc8bb; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc8bb; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=8e0ab73d-33d3-452c-853b-4a38fc2f2a41&ssb=70160263387&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-9326%2Fabc8bb&ssi=dd3dbec9-cnvj-418f-bb01-5a917e14fdf9&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=493032527868546901594183476055604430&ssn=750950339377c7f66b246374d0b83839b9156402f074-4cb6-43cc-b8d767&sso=59b7f5d5-86644739f8a5f80fb7b46f1ac6f7814c67fbc717eae9c0ae&ssp=83689186201728629378172967821687735&ssq=90719035202893463080175883393437010400891&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTkwYjQzMC04NzFlLTRjOGEtODhjNS1hOTI5ZGQ5NTBhYzkxNzI4Njc1ODgzNDM1OTc2MTQ1NDkxLTQxNzg0YTIyZDJlN2JlNjExNTk0MDYiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNTIwMjU5NjctODczMS00OWRlLTg2NDgtY2NlNTViOWU0YmFjMTMtMTcyODY3NTg4MzQzNjk3NjE0NTQ5MC0wZmE1NmE0YWMwOTY1M2MzMTU5NDAwIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know